Tuesday
Dec152009
Rep. Alan Grayson Blasts Afghanistan Strategy As 'Fundamentally Wrong'
By Laura Smith - University of New Mexico/Talk Radio News Service
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) decried the Afghanistan strategy being currently pursued by the Obama administration as “fundamentally wrong” during a press conference Tuesday.
"[The strategy is] based on the premise that our country knows what’s best for other people, it’s based upon the premise that we have to send troops to the other side of the world because that’s the only way to protect ourselves. Those propositions are simply wrong," said Grayson.
Grayson made his statement moments after taking the House floor to urge his fellow Congressmen to oppose troop escalations.
Grayson cast the notion of sending 100,000 servicemen and women 8,000 miles away to protect the U.S. as absurd.
“Why don’t we protect our borders? Why don’t we work with other countries to try to crack down on the terrorists that the bedevil us all. Why is it that we have to occupy another country? This is an 18th century strategy being employed against a 14th century enemy,” said Grayson.
Grayson added that the war is costing too much, in both money and in lives.
“There’s too much blood being shed in Afghanistan, there’s too much blood being shed in Iraq," said Grayson. "There are simply better ways of accomplishing the same goals."
Grayson argued that both the Taliban and al-Qaeda are no longer a threat in Afghanistan, explaining that the Taliban government was kicked out of Kabul within two months after 9/11, and that within an additional month, al-Qaeda was similarly expelled.
The Florida Democrat invoked the ongoing debate over health care reform and said the amount of money being spent in Afghanistan is comparable to the money required to overhaul the U.S. health care system.
“Isn’t it more important to make sure that 47 million Americans can go to see a doctor when they need to than it is to send our young men and women across an ocean or across a continent to fight who knows what?” Grayson asked.
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) decried the Afghanistan strategy being currently pursued by the Obama administration as “fundamentally wrong” during a press conference Tuesday.
"[The strategy is] based on the premise that our country knows what’s best for other people, it’s based upon the premise that we have to send troops to the other side of the world because that’s the only way to protect ourselves. Those propositions are simply wrong," said Grayson.
Grayson made his statement moments after taking the House floor to urge his fellow Congressmen to oppose troop escalations.
Grayson cast the notion of sending 100,000 servicemen and women 8,000 miles away to protect the U.S. as absurd.
“Why don’t we protect our borders? Why don’t we work with other countries to try to crack down on the terrorists that the bedevil us all. Why is it that we have to occupy another country? This is an 18th century strategy being employed against a 14th century enemy,” said Grayson.
Grayson added that the war is costing too much, in both money and in lives.
“There’s too much blood being shed in Afghanistan, there’s too much blood being shed in Iraq," said Grayson. "There are simply better ways of accomplishing the same goals."
Grayson argued that both the Taliban and al-Qaeda are no longer a threat in Afghanistan, explaining that the Taliban government was kicked out of Kabul within two months after 9/11, and that within an additional month, al-Qaeda was similarly expelled.
The Florida Democrat invoked the ongoing debate over health care reform and said the amount of money being spent in Afghanistan is comparable to the money required to overhaul the U.S. health care system.
“Isn’t it more important to make sure that 47 million Americans can go to see a doctor when they need to than it is to send our young men and women across an ocean or across a continent to fight who knows what?” Grayson asked.
tagged Grayson, Laura Smith, afghanistan, protect, troops in Congress, News/Commentary
Iraqi-American-Blogger: The War In Is Not Over
By Lisa Kellmna
Despite President Obama’s assurance last week that all American troops will be out of Iraq by the end of the year, Iraqi-American blogger, Raed Jarrar, in an interview today, insisted while this will help Iraq move forward, America will continue to have an obtrusive presence .
Jarrad and those in Iraq believe the war will not end until military and non military American forces erase their footprint in Iraq completely.
By the end of 2011, The U.S. Department of Defense will remove the 40,000 troops still stationed in Iraq, shut all U.S. military bases and hand them over to the Iraqis, leaving only 160 service members in the Iraqi Embassy as part of the Office of Security Cooperation.
The U.S. Department of State, on the other hand, plans on doubling its personnel from 8,000 to 16,000, half of whom will be armed, in order to train Iraqi soldiers and government members and provide basic aid.
However, training is not the issue argued Jarrar.
“Iraqis and neighboring countries view the Iraqi government and armed forces as puppets of a foreign occupation and legitimacy will not be brought to them by the U.S. presence,” Jarrar said.
Jarrar acknowledged Iraq’s broken military and political system, but emphasized America’s military presence has not nor will ever be part of the solution.
According to Jarrar, to help Iraqis, America needs to cease its military and non military intervention in Iraq. Those in Iraq who have committed crimes and contributed to Iraq’s downfall need to be held responsible, and the U.S. needs to compensate Iraqis for the destruction it has caused since first arriving.
“The vast majority of solutions will come from within Iraq, by Iraqis, and for Iraqis, things that foreigners cannot and should not attempt to fix,” said Jarrar.