Pipeline Protesters Plan To Surround The White House

By Mike Hothi

Environmentalists are planning to encircle the White House  Sunday in an attempt to convince President Barack Obama to come out against the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

“Young people still believe in Barack Obama but we know that he’s going to need a little bit of a push from us to make the right decision,” Maura Cowley, co-director of the Energy Action Coalition, said during a press conference Friday.

Organizers believe that surrounding the White House will provide that push.

“There will be no attack on the President on Sunday. Every banner that will be there will simply be a quote from President Obama in 2008,” stated Bill Mckibben of 350.org, referring to statements the President made on the campaign trail, such as “Time the end the tyranny of oil. On my watch the rise of the oceans will begin to slow and the planet will begin to heal.”

The Keystone XL pipeline, which will transport oil form Alberta, Canada through Texas, will need a presidential permit from the State Department since it crosses a national border. The State Department expects to make a decision on the pipeline by the end of the year.

Graham Climbs Aboard Climate Change Bandwagon

By Ravi Bhatia - Talk Radio News Service

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has teamed up with Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) to find common ground on creating bipartisan climate change legislation, with hopes of making progress before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen next month.

“The green economy is coming. We can either follow or lead,” Graham said at a press conference on Wednesday. “Those countries who follow will pay a price. those countries who lead in creating a new green economy for the world will make money.”

Graham and Kerry wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times published on Oct. 11 that highlighted some of the goals of the legislation, which include acknowledging that climate change is real, investing in wind, solar and nuclear energy and breaking U.S dependence on foreign oil.

Republicans boycotted the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee markups of the Kerry-Boxer Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act on Tuesday and Wednesday in an attempt to urge the committee to submit the legislation to the Environmental Protection Agency for economic analysis. Ranking member Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) was the lone Republican to attend Wednesday’s meeting, although he departed after only 15 minutes.

“I do believe that all of the cars we have on the road and the trucks and the energy we use that produces carbon daily is not a good thing for the planet,” Graham said. “But if environmental policy is not good business policy you’ll never get 60 votes.”

According to Lieberman, the stakes are “too high” to wait on drafting climate change legislation.

“We will be held accountable by history unless we make every effort to find common ground,” he said.

Stop Investing In Developing Nations' Coal Power Plants Or Face Drastic Consequences, Say Environmental Experts

By Laura Woodhead - Talk Radio News Service

A panel of environmental experts argued Thursday that industrialized nations need to stop investing in coal powered power plants in developing nations or risk grave global environmental consequences.

Bruce Rick, Senior Counsel for International Finance and Development at the Environmental Defense Fund, maintained that the issue is not the sovereign right of developing nations to decide what energy investments they want, but the role that developed countries should play in encouraging non - developed countries to adopt renewable energy policies.

"If we cant reverse the increasing carbonization of the world's energy sources...the entire rich industrialized world could reduce their CO₂ emissions to 0 by 2030, and if the current investment trends continue, the world would still over shoot what is considered dangerous global warming" said Rick during a discussion on "The International Public Financing of Coal in a Carbon Constrained World" with the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EEIS)

The panel also discussed the health risks posed by the increasing investment in coal powered plants. While acknowledging the health benefits that electricity can bring to non-developed nations, John M Balbus M.D MPH said that between 6000 and 10,700 deaths annually could be specifically attributed to the 88 power plants funded by developed nations over the past 15 years, causing a "hidden ongoing toll of death and disease."

Director of Environmental Department at the World Bank, Warren Evans, acknowledged the pivotal role that many US investors play in the climate change debate, but said it was important to keep these issues within their social and economic perspectives.

"[For many nations it is] simply a choice between growth and clean up later or no growth at all" Evans said. The Director added that it is important for the U.S. to assume a strong leadership role in the quest for low carbon emissions across the world.

Lake-Destroying Mining Operation OK, High Court Rules

The Supreme Court today blessed a gold mining operation in Alaska that is virtually guaranteed to kill all the wildlife in a nearby lake — although the mining company promises it will later "reclaim" the lake, filling it with organic material to make it an even better wildlife habitat.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had already approved the project, which was being disputed by a coalition of Alaskan environmental groups. In upholding the agencies' approval, the Court upheld its familiar rule that federal agencies are entitled to deference.

The case stemmed out of a proposal by Couer Alaska to reopen the Kensington Gold Mine, near Juneau, which had been closed since 1928. Couer hoped to make the mine profitable by using a technique called "froth flotation" to pull gold-bearing minerals to the top of a tank of roiling water. Couer would then dispose of the crushed rock and water slurry in the Lower Slate Lake, three miles away in the Tongass National Forest. The slurry would almost completely fill the 23-acre lake, currently 51 feet deep at its maximum, transforming it into a 60-acre lake about one foot deep. In the process, all the fish and fauna in the lake would die.

The alternative, Coeur argued, was to place the slurry on nearby wetlands, creating a pile that would rise twice as high and cover three times the area of the Pentagon. This would permanently destroy dozens of acres of wetlands.

Couer needed federal approval before it could proceed with its plan. Two separate provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA) seemed to give authority over the discharge of slurry to both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over the creation of wetlands, and the Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for monitoring levels of waste in the water.

The Army Corps approved the gold mining plan, finding it was the "least environmentally damaging" way to dispose of the slurry, and that the damage would only be temporary, since in the future the reclaimed lake will be an even better wildlife habitat. The EPA declined to veto the Corps permit.

The permit was challenged by the Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (SEACC), a coalition of 12 Alaskan environmental groups. According to SEACC, the Army Corps did not have the authority to approve the mining operation because a section of the CWA forbids even tiny solid waste discharges -- and that includes the slurry discharge, 30% of which is solid waste. The company and the federal government argued that another section of the CWA grants the Army Corps blanket authority to permit the discharge of the slurry.

In light of the ambiguities in the CWA, the Court looked to the agencies' interpretation -- and found that the agencies had resolved the problem "in a reasonable and coherent way." An internal EPA memo explained that the prohibition on solid waste discharge applies not to the initial discharge of slurry into the lake, but to any further discharge into downstream waters.

The Army Corps had the sole authority to grant the permit, the Court ruled, because the slurry would fall under the regulations for "fill material," which is solely under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps, not the EPA.

Three justices dissented, arguing that the use of waters as "settling ponds" for harmful mining waste runs "antithetical to the text, structure and purpose of the Clean Water Act."

The case was Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (07-984/07-990).

Pelosi Paints the Capital Green

By Michael Ruhl, University of New Mexico – Talk Radio News Service

To mark Earth Day, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi introduced a plan to paint green the marble columns of the Capitol with energy efficiency and environmental initiatives. She calls it the “Green the Capitol Initiative.”

Pelosi’s plan involves 15 distinct steps to conserve energy and reduce waste, and is aimed specifically at congressional offices. Among Pelosi’s 15 measures are the use of compact florescent light bulbs, recycling used office items, and conserving electricity by powering off lights and computers while not in use. Additionally, Speaker Pelosi is encouraging the use of public transportation and the conservation of basic office supplies.

“The Capitol, which has always served as a beacon of freedom, is now a shining example of sustainability.” Pelosi said. She continued that the House has reduced its carbon emissions by 72 percent recently. She continued that if all Congressional offices adopt this plan, it will result in a savings of $1 million in energy costs and will cut energy consumption in the Capitol by nearly 10 percent.

Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-Oreg.), who Pelosi called “the main instigator” of the green plan, believes that Congress is setting a good example for the rest of the country. He said, “If we model the behavior we want the rest of America to follow, it has a profound effect.”

Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM) said that one of the first things he did when coming into Congress was institute a recycling program in his offices. He grinned at the savings

“Just during the transition from the 110th to 111th Congress, Congress saved over 60,000 pounds of paper. Lujan joked with the Speaker, “I was going to bring an example of that, but I couldn’t forklift it in, just to give an example of what we’ve truly saved.”

Pelosi called it the moral responsibility of Congress. Her office is encouraging all members to adopt these “green” plans. “I think most members of the Congress are doing some of this,” but she could not give exact numbers on who has implemented all of these recommendations. “The Speakers office is doing all of this,” Pelosi said proudly of the recommendations.