Thursday
Mar112010
Democrats Writing Healthcare Bill Behind Closed Doors, Gregg Accuses
By Laurel Brishel Prichard
University of New Mexico/Talk Radio News Service
Sens. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said Thursday that the health reform bill must first become a law before reconciliation can be used to amend it.
“So much of this bill may be subject to the Byrd Rule and may go in one way and come out another way, assuming it comes out at all,” Gregg told reporters during a brief session.
Senate Republicans have secured 41 signatures on a letter demanding that reconciliation only be used on legislation involving budget adjustments, and not major policy changes, said Alexander.
“If any sentence is deemed that the policy is more significant then the budget adjustments that it applies to...it will be knocked out, the paragraph will be knocked out, and the section will be knocked out,” said Gregg.
Alexander reiterated a GOP desire to deal with reforming the nation's healthcare system in a "step-by-step" manner. Gregg agreed, and argued that a more piecemeal approach would yield a more transparent process.
“The simple fact is [Democrats] are hiding the bill. This is another one of those processes where it's being written in a hidden room, behind a hidden room, behind a hidden door,” said Gregg.
University of New Mexico/Talk Radio News Service
Sens. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said Thursday that the health reform bill must first become a law before reconciliation can be used to amend it.
“So much of this bill may be subject to the Byrd Rule and may go in one way and come out another way, assuming it comes out at all,” Gregg told reporters during a brief session.
Senate Republicans have secured 41 signatures on a letter demanding that reconciliation only be used on legislation involving budget adjustments, and not major policy changes, said Alexander.
“If any sentence is deemed that the policy is more significant then the budget adjustments that it applies to...it will be knocked out, the paragraph will be knocked out, and the section will be knocked out,” said Gregg.
Alexander reiterated a GOP desire to deal with reforming the nation's healthcare system in a "step-by-step" manner. Gregg agreed, and argued that a more piecemeal approach would yield a more transparent process.
“The simple fact is [Democrats] are hiding the bill. This is another one of those processes where it's being written in a hidden room, behind a hidden room, behind a hidden door,” said Gregg.
Measure To Reform Fannie And Freddie Fails
The GSE (Government Sponsored Enterprise) Bailout Elimination and Taxpayer Protection Amendment, sponsored by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), would have forced the government to relinquish control of the two government-backed mortgage giants within two years.
Recently, Fannie Mae, which lost $13.1 billion during the first quarter of this year, asked the government for an additional $8.4 billion to stay afloat. Similarly, Freddie Mac asked the government for $10.6 billion in funds after reporting a loss of $8 billion for the quarter. Combined, the two companies have borrowed $145 billion from the Treasury Department since the government took complete ownership of them during the heart of the nation’s financial collapse in 2008.
"We are not saying that Freddie and Fannie have to go out of business. We're saying we want them to be a business that is on a level playing field with other private sector competitors," said McCain to reporters today, hours before his amendment went down in a 56-43 vote.
Though most Republicans supported the item, it had its fair share of skeptics.
First, critics, including many Democrats in Congress, believed the measure would unwind Fannie and Freddie so quickly that it would create chaos throughout the entire housing market. House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who has said he supports reforming the two GSE’s, called the amendment a huge gamble.
“Simply to abolish Fannie and Freddie...and not do anything to replace the functions they are now performing with a conservatorship, would be a disaster for housing, and therefore for the economy as a whole,” he said last week.
Furthermore, the liberal Center for American Progress recently referred to the legislation as “The Credit Crunch Restoration Act of 2010,” arguing that by abolishing a large chunk of the mortgage backing industry, millions of Americans would lose access to credit.