Friday
Feb132009
Judd Gregg: “I made a mistake”
Friday, February 13, 2009 at 5:42AM
On Thursday afternoon the baseball hit the batter as yet another Department Secretary took flight from the Obama administration. Soon-to-be Secretary of Commerce Judd Gregg, Republican Senator from New Hampshire, withdrew his name from consideration for the Cabinet position 10 days after having been nominated. This is President Obama’s second Commerce Secretary to go down in flames, following New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson’s withdrawal.
In a statement before the press conference, Gregg cited “irreconcilable differences” with the Obama administration in the Economic Recovery Plan and Census handling as the primary reasons for his withdrawal. At his press conference, however, Senator Gregg stated that the position was simply a “bridge too far” for him, and that the Census issue was only “a slight catalyzing issue; it was not a major issue”. Gregg would not elaborate further on the Census issue, and dodged any questions which would shed more light on it.
The Obama Administration has expressed downright confusion as this withdrawal, claiming that they were approached by Gregg, but the Senator himself has a completely different story. He said, “One of the nice things about this business is that everyone has a different recollection of what happened.” Gregg claimed that the Obama administration approached him for the position, and that he “made a mistake” by accepting the position hastily. He continued that holding a Cabinet position would interfere with how he really wants to approach issues. Gregg said that his confidence in President Obama’s Administration caused him to accept the position “without thinking through the implications” of his decision. (01:20)
By Michael Ruhl, University of New Mexico – Talk Radio News Service
In a statement before the press conference, Gregg cited “irreconcilable differences” with the Obama administration in the Economic Recovery Plan and Census handling as the primary reasons for his withdrawal. At his press conference, however, Senator Gregg stated that the position was simply a “bridge too far” for him, and that the Census issue was only “a slight catalyzing issue; it was not a major issue”. Gregg would not elaborate further on the Census issue, and dodged any questions which would shed more light on it.
The Obama Administration has expressed downright confusion as this withdrawal, claiming that they were approached by Gregg, but the Senator himself has a completely different story. He said, “One of the nice things about this business is that everyone has a different recollection of what happened.” Gregg claimed that the Obama administration approached him for the position, and that he “made a mistake” by accepting the position hastily. He continued that holding a Cabinet position would interfere with how he really wants to approach issues. Gregg said that his confidence in President Obama’s Administration caused him to accept the position “without thinking through the implications” of his decision. (01:20)
By Michael Ruhl, University of New Mexico – Talk Radio News Service
Obama's Budget creeps towards the Senate
Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag testified before the Senate Committee on the Budget concerning President Obama’s FY2010 Budget. Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) praised the transparency and initiatives set forward in the budget, which included healthcare reform, a revamping of education, and a shift away from dependence on foreign oil.
Ranking Member Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) criticized the costs associated with the budget. Gregg pointed out that the debt to GDP ratio in 2013 will be 67% and questioned how sustainable such a costly plan could be. He said that it would double the publicly held national debt in 5 years.
Orszag stated that this budget accounts for $2.7 trillion in costs not accounted for in previous budgets, and although it would see some increases in mandatory spending, but this is partially due to baseline changes in this spending. He continued that healthcare reform would help, because one of the problems with entitlement spending is that a disproportionate amount of it is in Medicare and Medicaid.