myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief

Entries in geoff holtzman (77)

Wednesday
Jun232010

McChrystal Steps Down, Petraeus Named New Afghan Commander 

General Stanley McChrystal will be replaced as U.S. Commander in Afghanistan by General David Petraeus, after comments from McChrystal and his staff mocking administration officials made it into an upcoming issue of Rolling Stone magazine.

President Barack Obama announced the change during a statement Wednesday afternoon from the White House Rose Garden.

“Today I accepted General Stanley McChrystal’s resignation as commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan,” he said. “I did so with considerable regret, but also with certainty that it is the right thing for our mission in Afghanistan, for our military and for our country.

As the head of U.S. Central Command, Petraeus is currently McChrystal's boss. He must be confirmed by the Senate before he can assume his new role. Mr. Obama did not say who will fill Petraeus' position.

The decision to appoint Petraeus will likely shield the President from the political fallout of relieving a current commander. Petraeus garners immense respect from both Democrats and Republicans, a factor that will prove important as U.S. and Afghan security forces prepare for a major offensive in Kandahar province this summer. Perhaps more importantly, Petraeus is reportedly liked by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who notably possessed a fond view of Petraeus' predecessor.

The Rolling Stone article was not the first instance in which the four-star General had frustrated the White House. Last October, McChrystal gave a speech in which he publicly shot down a counter-insurgency approach to the Afghan war promoted by Vice President Joe Biden. The President reportedly scolded the commander for the remarks during a private meeting aboard Air Force One, but McChrystal’s call for additional troops was implemented soon after.

However, the Rolling Stone article seemed to be the last straw for the White House. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Tuesday that the President was visibly angry when shown excerpts and the General was summoned from the Afghan capital of Kabul for a face-to-face meeting.

“The conduct does not meet the standard that should be met by a commanding general,” Mr. Obama said.

McChrystal assumed the role of Afghan Commander last summer. He replaced General David Mckiernan.

Talk Radio News Service Correspondent Geoff Holtzman contributed to this report.
Tuesday
Jun222010

Cuts In ADAP A Major Blow To AIDS Patients  

Imagine being gang-raped. Imagine the pain it causes, the shame it inflicts and the endless trauma it bears. Now, imagine being told just months later that you’ve contracted HIV as a result. This is the story of Elizabeth Shepherd.

In 1997, Shepherd was raped by five African-American men in Charleston, S.C., who allegedly targeted her because she was white. Shepherd was admitted to a local hospital where she was treated for multiple injuries. Having suffered severe physical and mental trauma, Shepherd was in critical condition, and in no position to deal with bad news. But then, her doctors told her that the men who had raped her all had AIDS.

“I was in the hospital for four months,” she told me. “During that time the doctors came to me and told me that those five strains of AIDS were growing inside me to create one, new, mutated monster.”

The news got even worse for Shepherd. Six months after she was released from the hospital, a test confirmed that, in fact, she was HIV-positive. However, due to limited resources, the state of South Carolina informed her that she would have to be put on a waiting list for any life-saving treatments. Imagine…you’re told you have a disease that kills millions each year and there is nothing you can do.

“Without any medications people get depressed and dismayed,” she said. “They start feeling hopeless.”

For two years, Shepherd remained on that waiting list, fully aware that her health could immediately deteriorate at any moment. But in 1999, Shepherd finally received a slimmer of good news. The state had received enough funding that year to expand its AIDS Drug Assistance Program, or ADAP. Shepherd was off the wait list, and on her way to securing medicine she previously could not afford. On average, most Americans that are diagnosed with AIDS live anywhere between one and ten years. 13 years after learning she was HIV-positive, Shepherd is not only still alive, but has transformed herself from a junkie to a working, college-educated citizen who is making a positive impact on the lives of others.

Shepherd likely owes her life to ADAP. And she is not alone.

The program, created in 1987 and then incorporated by Congress into the Ryan White Care Act three years later, has provided hundreds of thousands of low-income Americans with HIV and AIDS, access to affordable treatment drugs.

Under the rules of ADAP, states are granted the authority to establish and manage their own individual programs, using a mix of federal HHS funds as well as money from their own budgets to pay for them. In addition, organizations like the Community Access National Network and the ADAP Advocacy Association have donated annually to keep the programs healthy.

A report done by the Kaiser Family Foundation three years ago determined that the total budget of the program, which was active in all 50 states, amounted to 1.4 billion dollars in 2007. During that year, the program provided treatment or coverage to 102,000 Americans, a figure representing roughly 30% of those infected with HIV in the U-S. However, a rise in that number coupled with one of the worst recessions in the country’s history has rendered some states unable to match their supply of medication with the demand of those in need. Moreover, as Congress grapples with ways to cut spending, the share of HHS dollars earmarked for ADAP has gradually decreased in recent years.

Bill Arnold, who directs the National ADAP Working Group, says the federal contribution has shrunk by almost 25% over the last decade. Arnold argues however, that expanding deficits and mounting pressure on Congress to cut spending aren’t enough of an excuse to neglect those who rely on the program.

“We may not be thrilled about some costs for some people or some medicines, but we have them,” he said. “Not providing access to them generates genuine risk to health and life.”

Right now, the lives of hundreds of HIV and AIDS-infected Americans, unable to pay for live-saving medications, are in severe jeopardy over Congress’s inability to extend funding for ADAP. In June, the number of Americans on state waiting lists topped 1,400 for the first time ever, with almost 300 new names being added last week ALONE. Congress, says Arnold, has an obligation to find a way to help these people.

“Morality says you find the medicine, ethics says you find the medicine, and medical ethics says you don’t cut off the medicine once somebody’s on it.”

So, how much cash are we talking about to help patients get the treatment they need? One hundred twenty-six million. That’s million, with an “M.” I repeat: $126 million is the difference right now between potential life and death for hundreds of people. Now, for a man or woman earning 30,000 dollars a year, struggling to pay the rent, that may seem like a substantial amount. But consider this: A report put out by the Heritage Foundation makes that figure look like a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of money the federal government wastes each year. For example, in 2008, the federal government made at least $72 billion worth of improper payments, and in 2009, it spent $25 billion to maintain vacant or unused properties. Additionally, that same report found that the refusal of many federal employees to fly coach costs taxpayers $146 million annually in flight upgrades. Recouping those dollars alone would be enough to keep ADAP going for DECADES.

Fortunately, some on Capitol Hill have taken note of the problem, and are proposing doing something about it. A bill introduced last month by Republican Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina, and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, would use unobligated Recovery Act dollars to fund ADAP through the rest of 2010. The measure has broad support in the Senate, but not yet in the House, where companion legislation would be needed. Unlike Burr, Coburn, and Florida Republican George LeMieux, House Republicans have been reluctant to back any bill attached to stimulus money. Even Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who was given a sparkling grade by the ADAP Advocacy Association for her efforts to combat AIDS, has not yet endorsed the bill. Across the aisle, Democrats are withholding support, happy to score cheap points by exploiting the GOP for prioritizing politics over the health and well being of over 1,400 people at risk.

Shepherd says her lobbying efforts have fallen on deaf ears of members concerned more with getting re-elected than saving lives.

“I found no interest, nobody’s interested. All I found was politics,” she said. “Nobody’s interested in putting a dime in, or doing anything.”

To secure funding, Arnold says he’s tried going directly to the administration, but to no avail.

“There have been letters to [HHS Secretary Kathleen] Sebelius, there have been letters to the President. There has been no response to any of these letters.”

Arnold is holding out hope that this lack of acknowledgment has more to do with federal officials simply not yet having a plan in place to deal with ADAP than it does with them being impartial to the plight of a minuscule percentage of the population. Still, to people like Shepherd who have lived through the hardship of uncertainty that comes with being stuck on a waiting list, the current stalemate in Washington gives her an all-too familiar feeling.

“We are stuck with no help. It looks like there is no help at all.”

This story was also published in the opinion section of today's Daily Caller
Tuesday
Jun222010

President Vows To Fight GOP Attempts To Repeal Healthcare Law

President Barack Obama pledged Tuesday to protect the healthcare reform law he signed into law earlier this year from repeal.

During his remarks inside the East Room of the White House, the President asked an audience, comprised mainly of businesses representatives and individuals that supported the Affordable Care Act, whether they wanted to scrap reforms such as prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing medical conditions.

“Would you wanna go back?" he asked. After pausing momentarily, he firmly stated, “We’re not going back.”

Several Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), have publicly called for striking down the law numerous times since it was passed back in March. The GOP has made it no secret that it will campaign on the idea of repealing healthcare during this year’s campaign season. And just last week, the House narrowly voted down a motion put forth by Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.) that, if passed, would've repealed the law's mandate on individuals to purchase health insurance.

Nonetheless, Mr. Obama promised those in the room today that no such thing would happen on his watch.

“I refuse to go back, and so do countless Americans who bravely shared their stories with me over two years as I traveled this country.”
Tuesday
Jun222010

McChrystal Could Be Fired Over Rolling Stone Remarks, Says Gibbs

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Tuesday that it’s possible Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, could be fired over disparaging comments he and some of his aides made about President Obama and others in the administration during an interview with Rolling Stone that will hit magazine stands later this week.

McChrystal was summoned by Mr. Obama to travel from Afghanistan to Washington today after excerpts of the story were leaked to various news organizations overnight. When asked whether the President might relieve the general of his duties, Gibbs replied, “all options are on the table.”

Gibbs said he showed Mr. Obama particularly incendiary parts of the story on Monday evening, and that the President was visibly “angry.” Mr. Obama had not spoken directly with McChrystal as of today, said Gibbs, but that will change when the two meet tomorrow. The purpose of the meeting, according to Gibbs, will be “to find out what the hell [McChrystal] was thinking.”
Thursday
Jun172010

Barton Apologizes For Apologizing To BP

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), the ranking Republican member on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, now says he is sorry for apologizing to BP CEO Tony Hayward during an intensely-watched hearing this morning.

Before Hayward began his prepared remarks to the committee, Barton told him “I’m ashamed of what happened in the White House yesterday," referring to an agreement reached between BP and the White House to establish a $20 billion independently-managed escrow account to handle the claims filed against the company. He added, “I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that…amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize.”

Democrats pounced on Barton as soon as the news of his comments broke. "House Republicans continue to side with Big Oil over the needs of the American people," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Vice President Joe Biden told White House reporters he found Barton's remarks "incredibly insensitive, incredibly out of touch." Press Secretary Robert Gibbs later said the President had been made aware of the comments, and replied that he could not "understand why anyone would say that.”

In all likelihood, it was such blow-back that prompted Barton to issue the following statement:

“I apologize for using the term ‘shakedown’ with regard to yesterday’s actions at the White House in my opening statement this morning, and I retract my apology to BP. As I told my colleagues yesterday and said again this morning, BP should bear the full financial responsibility for the accident on their lease in the Gulf of Mexico. BP should fully compensate those families and businesses that have been hurt by this accident. BP and the federal government need to stop the leak, clean up the damage, and take whatever steps necessary to prevent a similar accident in the future. “I regret the impact that my statement this morning implied that BP should not pay for the consequences of their decisions and actions in this incident.”