World Health Organization Says N1H1 Pandemic Over
Even if the World Health Organization’s global “swine flu” pandemic alert was lifted today, the international community was “lucky” the N1H1 virus did not mutate into a a more lethal form , says WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan.
“This does not mean that the H1N1 virus has gone away” Dr. Chan told a press conference Tuesday. “We expect the H1N1 virus to take on the behaviour of a seasonal influenza virus and continue to circulate for some years to come.”
“Continued vigilance is extremely important, and WHO has issued advice on recommended surveillance, vaccination, and clinical management during the post-pandemic period.” said Dr. Chan, adding that vaccination continues to be the most cost effective way to protect H1N1 high risk groups.
In the past several months governments started scaling back their public health response to the H1N1 crisis, but WHO officials felt they needed more evidence that there were no out of season outbreaks or changes in the intensity of infection rates before dropping the alert.
Controversy surrounding the organization’s decision to upgrade the H1N1 situation to a pandemic in the summer of 2009 surfaced after a Council of Europe investigation into alleged ties between certain WHO Emergency Committee members and pharmaceutical companies. Chan says the names of its emergency committee members will be released shortly but was unclear if the WHO would continue to disclose the identity of committee members in the future.
Although she agrees there needs to be changes in the guidelines for future pandemic responses, Dr.Chan remains confident elevating the H1N1 status to a pandemic was the right thing to do. “We followed exactly the epidemiological and biological criteria as agreed by the experts of the world. And his was a true pandemic.”
The WHO has been able to confirm that at least 18 500 people died from H1N1 virus but this remains a conservative preliminary estimate and the organization will need to a few more years to determine the full extent of the crisis.
“Pandemics, like the viruses that cause them, are unpredictable. There will be many questions, and we will have clear answers for only some. “
Got Dengue Fever? Blame Climate Change
As if melting glaciers, higher sea levels and unpredictable weather weren't enough, because of global warming, the human race faces the potential spread of infectious diseases. A panel of climate experts on Monday discussed the possibility of this occurring in North America.
“Climate change will likely alter the current distribution of vectors and/or pathogens,” said Mary Hayden, a scientist with Centers for Disease Control. “Two major climate factors that promote the reproduction of infectious mosquitos are precipitation and temperature.”
Hayden predicts that by 2050, Aedes aegypti, the yellow fever mosquito, will likely migrate from areas in Mexico to U.S. cities along the Eastern seaboard. Additionally, outbreaks of Dengue fever have already been reported in Key West, Florida.
“Unfortunately, we’re seeing that Dengue Fever is increasing in number and severity. In Mexico alone, since 2005, there has been a 600 percent increase in cases, with no known vaccine,” said Hayden.
The panel used years of data that shows correlations between increased rainfall accumulations in Africa and the reproduction of water-thriving mosquitoes, with the spread of diseases including Dengue Fever, Malaria, Cholera and Hantavirus.
According to the World Health Organization's website: “Change in world climate would influence the functioning of many ecosystems and their member species. Likewise, there would be impacts on human health. Some of these health impacts would be beneficial. For example, milder winters would reduce the seasonal winter-time peak in deaths that occurs in temperate countries, while in currently hot regions a further increase in temperatures might reduce the viability of disease-transmitting mosquito populations. Overall, however, scientists consider that most of the health impacts of climate change would be adverse.”
The panel on Monday urged Congress to develop a comprehensive disease control and monitoring system that will help combat the onset of diseases that have increased in recent years.
“I believe Congress should be focused on our ability to monitor and track diseases generally, but particularly with diseases related to climate change,” said panelist Lynn Goldman, a professor at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Right now we are doing a good job, but certainly monitoring can be very much improved.”