Monday
Aug032009
U.S. Soldiers Exposed To Toxic Substance In Iraq, Cite Health Concerns
By Courtney Ann Jackson-Talk Radio News Service
Exposure to a toxic substance at a water injection facility in Iraq has left U.S. soldiers in deteriorating health. The U.S. Senate Democratic Policy Committee conducted a hearing Monday to investigate what some Senators would describe as the Army’s lackluster response.
“The Army failed to provide proper oversight over KBR's [military contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root] contract provisions that called for the contractor to identify, prevent and mitigate environmental hazards so as to protect the health and safety of workers and U.S. troops,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.).
Another hearing was held last year to address how KBR had exposed its own workers and hundreds of U.S. soldiers to a highly toxic chemical, sodium dichromate, at the Qarmat Ali water injection facility in the Spring and Summer of 2003.
Four National Guard soldiers testified at Monday's hearing and told the committee about their subsequent health problems.
Russell Powell, Former Staff Sergeant of the West Virginia Army National Guard said “I and many other soldiers and KBR workers had severe nosebleeds, coughed up blood, had difficulty breathing and nausea, and/or experienced a burning sensation in our lungs and throats. After a few weeks of being the facility, many of the soldiers around me began getting lesions on their hands, arms, faces, and in the nostril area.”
The sodium dichromate was described by all four men as a thick orange powder that often filled the air during windstorms. They said they were certainly aware of the substance but even after inquiring about its effects, were told it was only a mild irritant. Despite the dismissal of the substance’s harmful nature, the soldiers were consistently having health problems and finding it difficult to breathe in the facility and surrounding areas.
Herman Gibb, PhD, an expert on health risks associated with exposure to sodium chromate, testified that the chemical is considered to be a deadly carcinogen.
“Based on my experience working at the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] on risk assessments of hexavalent chromium and my study of chromate production workers, the symptoms reported by some of the soldiers who served at Qarmat Ali are consistent with significant exposure to sodium chromate,” Gibb said.
The soldiers stated that they continue to struggle with lingering respiratory, sinus, and other serious medical conditions.
Two of the four soldiers testifying were not notified until this year that they had been exposed to the carcinogen when they received a letter from their respective state’s National Guard under which they served.
Exposure to a toxic substance at a water injection facility in Iraq has left U.S. soldiers in deteriorating health. The U.S. Senate Democratic Policy Committee conducted a hearing Monday to investigate what some Senators would describe as the Army’s lackluster response.
“The Army failed to provide proper oversight over KBR's [military contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root] contract provisions that called for the contractor to identify, prevent and mitigate environmental hazards so as to protect the health and safety of workers and U.S. troops,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.).
Another hearing was held last year to address how KBR had exposed its own workers and hundreds of U.S. soldiers to a highly toxic chemical, sodium dichromate, at the Qarmat Ali water injection facility in the Spring and Summer of 2003.
Four National Guard soldiers testified at Monday's hearing and told the committee about their subsequent health problems.
Russell Powell, Former Staff Sergeant of the West Virginia Army National Guard said “I and many other soldiers and KBR workers had severe nosebleeds, coughed up blood, had difficulty breathing and nausea, and/or experienced a burning sensation in our lungs and throats. After a few weeks of being the facility, many of the soldiers around me began getting lesions on their hands, arms, faces, and in the nostril area.”
The sodium dichromate was described by all four men as a thick orange powder that often filled the air during windstorms. They said they were certainly aware of the substance but even after inquiring about its effects, were told it was only a mild irritant. Despite the dismissal of the substance’s harmful nature, the soldiers were consistently having health problems and finding it difficult to breathe in the facility and surrounding areas.
Herman Gibb, PhD, an expert on health risks associated with exposure to sodium chromate, testified that the chemical is considered to be a deadly carcinogen.
“Based on my experience working at the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] on risk assessments of hexavalent chromium and my study of chromate production workers, the symptoms reported by some of the soldiers who served at Qarmat Ali are consistent with significant exposure to sodium chromate,” Gibb said.
The soldiers stated that they continue to struggle with lingering respiratory, sinus, and other serious medical conditions.
Two of the four soldiers testifying were not notified until this year that they had been exposed to the carcinogen when they received a letter from their respective state’s National Guard under which they served.
KBR Accused Of Employee Inefficiency As Iraq Withdrawal Date Approaches
According to the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, defense contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root, Inc. are not using their employees in Iraq efficiently as the withdrawal date for U.S. troops approaches.
“The audit report basically says that if KBR staffing was to be reduced ... the government could save up to $193 million,” said Commission member Robert Henke, who noted that KBR is currently considered over-staffed. Concerns have also been raised that these excess workers are not performing enough work to justify the costs of maintaining their presence.
While the KBR has been criticized for not proactively reducing its Iraq workforce, a representative from KBR blamed government officials Monday for not providing an adequate direction through their oversight efforts.
“Why can’t the contractor be brought into this process sooner, so we can do a better job in preparing, in conjunction with the military, the plan?” asked KBR Principle Program Manager Guy A. J. Laboa during his testimony before the commission.
Commission Co-Chair Michael Thibault echoed a similar sentiment, and noted that the government should be more active in the oversight of contractors.