myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief

Entries in reconstruction (2)

Wednesday
May202009

Faulty Buildings Not Bullets Killing American Soldiers  

By Jonathan Bronstein, Talk Radio News

Senator Byron Dorgan
Senator Byron Dorgan
Ryan Masseth, a Staff Sergeant in the United States Army, was killed not by an enemy bullet, but by faulty electrical wiring. He was electrocuted while showering on a United States military installation in Baghdad during January 2008.

Yet, the company who wired the building, Kellogg, Brand and Root, also known as KBR, was aware of this issue some 11 months before Staff Sgt. Masseth’s death. The U.S. government recently reclassified Staff Sgt. Masseth’s death as accidental to gross negligence on the part of KBR.

“KBR’s shoddy electrical work wasted tax payer money,” said Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) at the Senate Democratic Policy Committee hearing, who continued to say, “and even worse put our service members at risk, sometimes for their lives. 18 people died as a result of this negligence.”

Senator Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), Chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, was critical of the government for giving bonuses to KBR from 2004 to 2008 that totaled some $85 million, even though their work failed often to meet even the most basic standards.

The Army’s standard definition for awarding bonuses requires that the contractor's “performance is of the highest quality that could be achieved under the contract. There are no areas of deficiencies or problems encountered during the evaluation period.”

The 2008 edition of the Defense Contract Management Report found that there were 26,205 incidents of improper wiring, 4,571 incidents of outlet box hazards, and 3,201 hazardous switches and fuses. All of these safety deficiencies pose an unneeded threat to American service people, according to Dorgan.

KBR Master Electrician, Eric Peters, estimated that 50 percent of all buildings were not wired properly, and it often took several visits before KBR’s poorly trained electricians could fix the problem. Each one of these visits was charged to the U.S. government, and therefore to the American taxpayer.

Lautenberg attributed KBR’s ability to obtain these large bonuses to the no-bid contracts given to corporations for the reconstruction of Iraq.

“I knew I could no longer work for a company so completely focused on the bottom line they would disregard the safety of their employees and those we were serving: our soldiers,” said Peters, who left KBR two months after being hired.

Jim Childs, another Master Electrician who worked for KBR, had similar gripes with the company and their complete disregard for safety.

“KBR did not do this work to any electrical code,” said Childs.

KBR even attempted to switch to the more lenient British electrical code, but upon re-inspecting the wiring according to the newly implemented standards he still discovered multiple violations.

Childs cited examples of safe buildings that KBR retrofitted and became dangerous, when he said “what had been a safe, properly wired building became a danger to those inside because the re-wiring performed by KBR was not done properly.”

When Childs attempted to solve the wiring problems with quick and cheap solutions, KBR refused to listen and wanted to re-wire the entire building, at the expense of the tax payer.

Childs travelled to Afghanistan to inspect KBR’s work their, but to his dismay, “I found the exact same code violations.”

This wiring situation, according to Childs, is an epidemic that needlessly endangers the lives of American servicemen and women.

Much like its own employees, the Department of Defense is also losing confidence in KBR’s ability.

Captain David Graff, Commander of Defense Contract Management Agency, said that “Many within the Department of Defense have lost or are losing all remaining confidence in KBR’s ability to successfully and repeatedly perform the required electrical support services mission in Iraq.”
Monday
May122008

Department of State “indirectly contributed to and has allowed corruption" in Iraq

In the Democratic Policy Committee hearing “Have Bush Administration Reconstruction and Anti-Corruption Failures Undermined the U.S. Mission in Iraq?” Chairman Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) said the U.S. government had contributed to the culture of corruption in Iraq, and that corruption involved both Iraqi and American money. This was the fourteenth in a series of oversight hearings to examine contracting fraud, waste, and abuse in Iraq.

Dorgan described the testimony provided in March to the Senate Appropriations Committee by Judge Radhi al Radhi, who had been the head of the Commission of Public Integrity (CPI), which Dorgan said is an anti-corruption committee established after the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He said Radhi estimated that corruption resulted in the loss of $18 billion in government funds, most of which had been U.S. taxpayer dollars.

Judge Arthur Brennan, former State Department Official who had served in Iraq in 2007 as the Director of the Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, said that the OAT team discovered that the Department of State “indirectly contributed to and has allowed corruption to fester at the highest levels of the Iraqi Government.” He also said that “In a sense, the Department of State has contributed to the killing and maiming of U.S. soldiers; the deaths of thousands of Iraqi civilians; the bolstering of illegal militias, insurgents and al-Qaida, and the enrichment and empowerment of the thieves controlling some of the Iraqi ministries.”

Brennan said the State Department never responded to an OAT report on the level of corruption in the 31 Iraqi ministries, and that to his knowledge, the State Department has never seen an audit of any Iraqi agency or ministry. He said “many of the ministries are controlled by criminals and guarded by armed thugs,” creating a dangerous situation for investigators.

James Mattil, who had been Chief of Staff for the Office of Accountability and Transparency, said OAT was under-staffed and had no operating budget, and that “there was no transparency even with the office of transparency.” He said “corruption and its consequences are the fuel that sustains the insurgency, providing the money, the people and the motivation to fight Americans in Iraq.” He respectfully disagreed with Ambassador Crocker’s conclusion that “Iraq’s leaders have the will to tackle the country’s pressing problems.” He said Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki is fighting Iraq’s anti-corruption agencies, not corruption, and provided an example where a new CPI commissioner was appointed who three weeks earlier had been arrested and jailed on corruption charges.