Republicans Tout Massive Anti-Obamacare Petition

By Mike Hothi

A collection of Republicans from both chambers touted a massive online petition Wednesday as evidence that the American people are firmly in favor of repealing the Affordable Care Act.

The petition, collected by RepealItNow.Org and presented to lawmakers this week, reportedly contains 1.6 million signatures.

Speaking during a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) cited the outpouring of support as evidence that the health care reform law should be overturned immediately, before the Supreme Court weighs in.

“This is not a partisan issue. This is an American issue,” DeMint, standing behind a stack of boxes containing the petition, said. “We cannot wait for the courts.”

The Affordable Care Act was signed into law last year and has been Conservatives’ go-to example for intrusive government under the Obama administration. The Supreme Court will likely determine the constitutionality of the law’s personal insurance mandate before the end of their current term. 

GOP Senators Intro Bill To Protect SC Boeing Facility

By Andrea Salazar

A group of Republican senators urged Congress Wednesday to pass a bill limiting the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) ability to shut down a Boeing Company facility in South Carolina.

The Acting General Counsel of the NLRB issued a formal complaint against Boeing alleging that it “violated federal labor law by deciding to transfer a second airplane production line from a union facility in the state of Washington to a non-union facility in South Carolina for discriminatory reasons.”

Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), John Thune (R-S.D), Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) warned against shutting down the South Carolina plant fearing negative economic effects.

“We want to make it easier for Boeing and Motorola and Westinghouse and Nissan and Toyota to build in the United States what they sell in the United States,” Alexander said. “NLRB’s action is making it easier for manufacturers to look at the United States and say, ‘We’re going to build overseas’.”

The bill, introduced by Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), would “prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any employer to close, relocate or transfer employment under any circumstance.”

“It’ll be hard to continue to make products in America if the NLRB can tell a company after they make an investment, ‘By the way, we’re going to veto your decision’,” Graham said. “The amount of power that this would give an unelected bureaucracy in an American economy is chilling.”

Sanders Defends Amendment To Audit The Fed

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) insisted on Friday that his amendment within a Senate financial regulatory reform bill to audit the Federal Reserve (Fed) would not grant Congress the authority to set monetary policy.

“That was not my intent,” Sanders said to reporters.

Sanders’s effort received a huge boost last night when he was able to strike a deal on the amendment with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) Under the agreement, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) would be authorized to perform a full audit of the Fed, going back to December 1, 2007. If the bill is signed into law, the GAO would be required to publish its findings online no later than one year after the law is enacted.

Most analysts say the amendment is not too radical of an idea. Sanders, on Friday, said it’s really just a matter of bringing about common-sense transparency to the financial system.

“The American people have a right to know what [Fed Chairman] Ben Bernanke has refused to allow them to know,” said Sanders, who admitted that the Chairman “is not one of my best friends.”

Indeed, the powerful banking agency along with firms on Wall Street are aggressively pushing back on the provision. Earlier this week, Bernanke wrote a letter to Dodd urging him to strip the amendment from the bill. But with Dodd -- the bill’s author -- as well as conservative South Carolina Republican Jim DeMint both saying they support Sanders, the measure looks like a safe bet to end up in the final Senate bill. Now, the question becomes whether or not it will survive a potential conference committee.

“Some of [the House bill’s] language is stronger that what we have, some of our language is stronger than what they have,” said Sanders, adding that the only thing on his mind right now is getting the 60 votes necessary to move forward on the legislation.

GOP Doesn’t Mind Being ‘Party Of No’ On Spending

With Democrats in the Senate getting set to put forth a jobs bill, perhaps as early as Monday, their counterparts across the aisle are saying ‘no’ to more spending.

“We have a situation now that’s just too serious to continue to handle that way,” said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) on Thursday. “It’s not an exaggeration to say our country is on the edge of a financial cliff.”

DeMint and fellow GOP Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and George LeMieux (R-Fla.) unveiled their party’s latest attempt to restore fiscal responsibility to Washington, calling on Congress to support a one-year moratorium on earmarks along with a Constitutional Amendment to balance the federal budget.

“What we’re doing here today, is to try and challenge everyone in the Senate -- Republican and Democrat -- to join us in those steps that we can take...to address our growing deficit,” said DeMint.

“Everything is gonna get cut...it’s gonna be painful, but I guarantee you that we can cut the agencies of government...by 20 percent even, maybe 30 percent,” added LeMieux.

McCain, a noted opponent of federal earmark spending, blasted President Barack Obama for supporting using unspent Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) funds to fuel a jobs bill which could total over $100 billion.

“The President says he’s gonna have a spending freeze next year, and in the very next breath proposes a hundred billion dollars in new spending called a ‘jobs bill.’ It’s out of control.”

The hard part now for the 11 cosponsors of the measures will be to actually practice what they preach. Graham, for example, has a known record of not being averse to requesting earmarks. As recently as 2009, he helped secure nearly 10 million dollars to fund construction of a fitness center inside Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina.

Graham, however, said he’s willing to bite the proverbial bullet in the short-run.

“It would be tough for us all, but it’s the right thing for the future. So I don’t mind an earmark system in the future that’s transparent, that’s logical and fits within a balanced budget.”

Sen Jim DeMint's "Union Bosses" Game

As soon as the Senate returns from its break, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reader will schedule a formal roll call vote on the nomination of Errol Southers to be Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration. Southers is former assistant chief of the Los Angeles Airport Police, and a former FBI agent. His confirmation hearings concluded this month, and his confirmation is considered highly likely.

Why is Reid holding this vote? It's an unusual move. It's because Sen. Jim DeMint put a hold on the nomination because he is concerned about unionization at the TSA. During his confirmation hearings, Southers wouldn't say whether he would support or oppose unionization efforts until he was "confirmed, in place and hearing from stakeholders about the issue."

That's not good enough for DeMint, whose spokesman Wesley Denton says: "This is an important debate because many Americans don't want someone running the TSA who stands ready to give union bosses the power to veto or delay future security measures at our airports."

DeMint through his spokesman makes it sound as though Southers has already made up his mind to support unionization, which is not what Southers said. However, the real meat here is in the phrase "union bosses," a classic derogatory term for union leaders. Further, the suggestion is that these "bosses" would veto or delay future security measures at our airports. Why exactly would they do that? Because they're unamerican, likely scary socialists and possibly craven communists? Why else would they deliberately endanger their own country?

DeMint now blames Reid for not allowing a debate on the nomination before adjourning, and still won't lift his hold.

Why do TSA workers want to unionize? Arbitrary work rules, a high rate of workplace injuries, high turnover rates, unfair promotion and scheduling policies, low morale and inadequate pay, for starters. I don't know about you, but I want the 40,000 people at the x-ray machines and everywhere else to be at least minimally content in their jobs.

It's interesting that Immigration and Custom Service employees and Federal Border Guards are unionized, but in 2003 President Bush decided it would threaten national security to allow the TSA to unionize. Don't the Federal Border Guards have something to do with national security?

DeMint is holding up Errol Southers because he can, also because he wants to defeat President Obama any time he can (remember Waterloo), and because he hates unions. The fact that the nation's national security got caught in the middle was apparently of little concern to him. Perhaps he didn't expect an attack on Christmas Day. Not many people did.