Friday
Oct172008
Latin American ambassadors discuss benefits of free trade
Several ambassadors from Latin American Countries held a discussion at the Heritage Foundation to discuss the advancement free trade, liberty and prosperity in the Western hemisphere.
Ambassador Tomas Duenas of Costa Rica spoke about the dramatic positive effect that free trade had had in Central America, and warned of the implications if trade barriers increased. He recounted that the United States instituted policies of protectionism during the Great Depression, which caused other countries to respond with their own protectionist policies and ended up harming the entire world’s economy. “We must work together then to avoid falling into a similar situation,” said Duenas, “in difficult times some groups could find it politically attractive to follow that extremely detrimental path.”
Other ambassadors expanded on the dramatic economic effects that their countries have experienced as a result of more open trade with the United States. Ambassador Federico Humbert of Panama discussed how his country has seen growth for 23 straight quarters, and that 75 percent of Panama’s cargo goes to or from the US.
Ambassador Mariano Fernandez Amunategui of Chile spoke about how his country exported $8.7 billion and imported $7.2 billion worth of goods with the US, making Chile a larger US importer than Russia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Argentina and Turkey.
Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan spoke about the mutual benefits that have resulted from free trade between Mexico and the United States. “Twenty-five million new jobs have been created in America, in the United States, since NAFTA was approved,” said Sarukhan, “...this is a success story.”
Ambassador Tomas Duenas of Costa Rica spoke about the dramatic positive effect that free trade had had in Central America, and warned of the implications if trade barriers increased. He recounted that the United States instituted policies of protectionism during the Great Depression, which caused other countries to respond with their own protectionist policies and ended up harming the entire world’s economy. “We must work together then to avoid falling into a similar situation,” said Duenas, “in difficult times some groups could find it politically attractive to follow that extremely detrimental path.”
Other ambassadors expanded on the dramatic economic effects that their countries have experienced as a result of more open trade with the United States. Ambassador Federico Humbert of Panama discussed how his country has seen growth for 23 straight quarters, and that 75 percent of Panama’s cargo goes to or from the US.
Ambassador Mariano Fernandez Amunategui of Chile spoke about how his country exported $8.7 billion and imported $7.2 billion worth of goods with the US, making Chile a larger US importer than Russia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Argentina and Turkey.
Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan spoke about the mutual benefits that have resulted from free trade between Mexico and the United States. “Twenty-five million new jobs have been created in America, in the United States, since NAFTA was approved,” said Sarukhan, “...this is a success story.”
Has The World Rushed To Judgment On Honduran Coup?
By attempting to run for reelection, did ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya’s violate his country's constitution? On Friday, representatives from seven Latin American organizations testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Western Hemisphere Subcommittee to discuss the question.
Certain members of the committee were adamant in their view that Zelaya's actions had, in fact, crossed constitutional boundaries.
“I think it was clear that virtually all major Honduran political institutions and actors opposed President Zelaya’s efforts. Not only were the Supreme Court, Congress, and Zelaya’s own Attorney General against him, even members of his own political party and the influential Catholic Church were hostile to Zelaya’s efforts to change the constitution,” said Committee Chairman Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y).
Cynthia Arnson, Director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars' Washington Office on Latin America, noted that Zelaya's actions should serve as a “wake-up call” that further progress to advance democracy in Latin America is still needed.
Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.), the committee's ranking member, said, “It seems to me that the more we look at Mr. Zelaya, the more we find a man who believes he is above the law, untouchable, and clearly a man who has no respect for democracy.”
Guillermo Perez-Cadalso, former Foreign Minister and Honduran Supreme Court Justice, said he believes the international community rushed to judgement over the coup before evaluating all the facts. He testified under the title of “Concerned Honduran Citizen" rather than using his official government title.
Perez-Cadalso argued that Zelaya was “legally and constitutionally removed from office,” and that the “military is not in charge of Honduras; the consitutional order of [the country] remains intact.”
The U.S. State Department headed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has endorsed a dialogue process with the Organization of American States. On that subject, Perez-Cadalso noted, “I am optimistic that this situation can be resolved through the dialogue. This process will be successful if both sides refrain from emotional personal reactions and stick to constructive discussions about the issues.”