Tuesday
Sep292009
Rockefeller Introduces Public Option Amendment To Finance Committee Bill
Travis Martinez, University of New Mexico /Talk Radio News Service
The biggest debate on the fifth day of markup of the America’s Healthy future Act focused heavily on the “public option.” Liberal Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa.) introduced his amendment to Senate Finance Comittee Chairman Max Baucus' (D-Mont.) mark providing for a “public option,” or what he calls the “Consumer Choice Health Plan.”
The debate began with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) criticizing Rockefeller's amendment, calling it a “Trojan horse for a single payer program [that] would lead to Washington controlling health care and monitoring prices."
Rockefeller kept a stern attitude on his amendment stating that, “It would not be a government takeover." However, the West Virginia Democrat refused to answer questions put to him by Hatch.
Heavy debate ensued on non-profit insurance programs from Senator Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and how well they have worked in his state, and how poorly the US as a whole compares to other nations. Conrad made a compelling argument for the “Mutual” based system with non-profit companies that would attempt to provide for universal healthcare coverage.
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) further argued that Medicare rates would be fixed during the first two years under Rockefeller's amendment - Rockefeller proudly held up two fingers. After the two years though, explained Bingaman, rates would be further negotiated, which would essentially adjust prices to fit in line with private companies.
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) compared the health care plan to universities, saying that "There’s both a private university and public university...there should be a choice."
Democrats agreed that Rockefeller’s amendment would build competition within the open market, while Republicans contended that it will bring price adjustments along with a government-run, single payer takeover of the entire healthcare system.
“This is a slippery slope to go down… it will lead to a government-run single payer option,” said Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.).
Markup is scheduled to continue late Tuesday night and will reconvene Wednesday morning.
The biggest debate on the fifth day of markup of the America’s Healthy future Act focused heavily on the “public option.” Liberal Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa.) introduced his amendment to Senate Finance Comittee Chairman Max Baucus' (D-Mont.) mark providing for a “public option,” or what he calls the “Consumer Choice Health Plan.”
The debate began with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) criticizing Rockefeller's amendment, calling it a “Trojan horse for a single payer program [that] would lead to Washington controlling health care and monitoring prices."
Rockefeller kept a stern attitude on his amendment stating that, “It would not be a government takeover." However, the West Virginia Democrat refused to answer questions put to him by Hatch.
Heavy debate ensued on non-profit insurance programs from Senator Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and how well they have worked in his state, and how poorly the US as a whole compares to other nations. Conrad made a compelling argument for the “Mutual” based system with non-profit companies that would attempt to provide for universal healthcare coverage.
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) further argued that Medicare rates would be fixed during the first two years under Rockefeller's amendment - Rockefeller proudly held up two fingers. After the two years though, explained Bingaman, rates would be further negotiated, which would essentially adjust prices to fit in line with private companies.
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) compared the health care plan to universities, saying that "There’s both a private university and public university...there should be a choice."
Democrats agreed that Rockefeller’s amendment would build competition within the open market, while Republicans contended that it will bring price adjustments along with a government-run, single payer takeover of the entire healthcare system.
“This is a slippery slope to go down… it will lead to a government-run single payer option,” said Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.).
Markup is scheduled to continue late Tuesday night and will reconvene Wednesday morning.
Leahy Asks Republicans To Give Eventual Supreme Court Nominee A Swift Confirmation
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who chairs the Judiciary Committee, urged his Republican colleagues Tuesday to give President Barack Obama's eventual nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens a speedy and congenial confirmation.
"The Senate and the Judiciary Committee are preparing to consider President Obama's nominee to succeed Justice Stevens, and I hope the pattern of delay and obstruction, [which] has been so evident in this Congress, will not affect the Commitee's fair and prompt consideration of the president's nominee," said Leahy during a press briefing.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who appeared alongside Leahy, expressed his disappointment that other key judicial nominees whose confirmations have been stalled.
"The delay is perplexing because most of these nominees are non-controversial and it's no accident that so little controversy surrounds them because President Obama selects judges who are clearly in the mainstream," Schumer said.
Stevens, who announced his retirement Friday, will leave the Court this summer. His decision gives Obama the chance to appoint his second Supreme Court Justice. In 2009, Obama appointed Justice Sonia Sotomayor.