Ambassador Wisner and Dimitri Simes discuss "Kosovo: What Next?" at the USIP

At the discussion “Kosovo: What Next?” held at the United States Institute of Peace, Ambassador Frank G. Wisner, Special Representative of the Secretary of State to the Kosovo Status talks, said that it is an “unusual declaration” for Kosovo to declare independence, because their independence will be supervised. It was clear to anyone, he said, that Kosovo had a few bridges that would need to be built across the divide toward independence. Serbia finds itself on a real threshold of history, and he said the opinion today is that Serbia is looking backwards with humiliation and cannot move forward if it continues to carry the “albatross of Kosovo” with it.

Wisner said that he did not think the outcome could have been different. The offer put on the table was limited autonomy, but the deeply held views by Serbia would prevent autonomy from being a solution. First and foremost, he said, if peace is to be maintained, the United States and the Europeans must be heavily involved in the detailed protection of the minorities in order to produce success.

The United States, he said, needs to reestablish ties with Belgrade because Serbia is a major factor in the Balkans. Why Russian chose to “draw a line’ over Kosovo is a question, he said, and Russia’s decision has produced a deep alienation between Moscow, many European capitals, and the United States. Russia’s blocking of the declaration is making them alienated, but he said he does not think that Russia’s opposition will continue much longer.

Dimitri K. Simes, President of The Nixon Center, said he thinks it is a tragedy to what extent informed people in the United States do not know “the other narrative,” which, he said, is very important. Russia is not going to use military force or establish bases in the Balkans. Russia will not cooperate, he said, because Moscow does not want Kosovo’s independence.

The problem, Simes said, is that if we are prepared to “swallow it,” he does not know why we are not prepared to make a deal with Russia. There are serious implications he said, and as a result of the United States violating the UN resolutions, Russia will most likely approach the Kosovo issue “selectively” just like the United States does. According to Simes, Moscow says that if the UN security resolutions can be ignored, Russia should be entitled to be selective when it is in Russia’s interests.

Ambassador Wisner said that his conclusion after listening to Simes was that Russia thinks it’s the most important element in the Kosovo issue, but that he disagrees. He said the United States interests were broader than that. He said he believes that Russia, like the United States, has interests that can be accommodated but that he does not believe that the cost of denying a solution to a problem that was “crying out” was wrong. His question to the audience was, ‘do we want to destroy the UN, are we going to leave the UN and revert Kosovo to autonomy?’ He declared that Russia’s view that autonomy was offered is disillusioned. UNSC Resolution 1244 makes it clear, he said, that there can be independence and that violation of national law has not occurred.

Hudson Institute holds conference on “Russia’s Presidential Transition: Will We See a Medvedev Thaw?”

The conference revolved around the issue of whether we can expect to encounter an era of liberalization when Dmitry Medvedev becomes president next month. Daniel Kimmage, Senior Analyst for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, began the event by showing a mini propaganda film from the Russian government that was inundated with pro-Russian images calling for people to participate in government. He focused on certain false assumptions people have of authoritarian regimes, such as that they 1) insist on a single party line; 2) want total control of the media; and 3) fight freedom online by restricting access to websites. It was interesting to learn that such is not the case for Russia. By walking the audience through the “United Russia” website, Kimmage demonstrated how the Kremlin approach incorporates the use of an ideological umbrella, with seeming variety and real accountability and democracy missing, and virtual politics, through various methods of marketing that create an illusion of choice but a reality of control. The most appealing aspect of Kimmage’s argument, however, was that instead of restricting websites, the Kremlin floods the internet with them to provide a wealth of attractive “alternatives,” and let opposing voices sound but be drowned out by the deluge. By doing this, the Kremlin can avoid an outcry over censorship while still controlling the ideology market.

Andre Piontkovsy, Visiting Fellow of the Hudson Institute, tried to provide a more optimistic view or the situation, stating “Freedom is better than no freedom.” The fact that the Russian people are given the opportunity to sift through the state sponsored propaganda and find the actual alternatives, the fact that they actually exist, is better than nothing.

Secretary Condoleezza Rice testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Budget 2009 Hearing

At the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Budget for Fiscal Year 2009 Hearing, Representative Illeana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), said there are many developments in the present that were of concern. At the top of the list, she said, is the "accelerating spread of the capacity to make nuclear weapons." She said the threat to the world’s security is obvious, and said the nuclear fuel in a reactor can be used in "dirty bombs."

She went on to say that our efforts in North Korea to have them give up their nuclear weapons program has encountered obstacles, and that we are in danger of making the same errors we have made in the past. The greatest threat to the world’s security, she said, is Iran’s determination to lay the foundation for a nuclear weapons program.

Lehtinen said that China and Russia continue to assist Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, and said "I regret that the Olympics are being held in the capital of a country which does not respect the human rights of its own population."

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that "we’ve made a lot of progress" over the last several years. In Iraq, she said, we really did not have an institution that could deal with the restructuring. If America does not stand for freedom, liberty, and the rights of the oppressed, she said, then nobody will.

Chairman Howard Berman (D-CA) asked Rice if the American people should be worried about Iran’s nuclear capability. Rice answered the enrichment of fissile materials were of a great danger. In answer to questions from Lehtinen, she said that we have worked with the Army Corps of Engineers to deal with the tunnels in Egypt and the smuggling problems. She said it’s important to note that there are intensive discussions going on with the Egyptians and the Israelis to find a solution that involves all parties, but has no intention of talking to Haamas.

For Afghan reconstruction, Rice said that there is "about a billion dollars" being requested. In response to Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Rice said our commitment to Afghanistan over the last six years has been over 20 billion dollars. This was in defense to the statement by Rohrabacher about the budget being overfunded in the favor of humanitarian assistance programs such as AIDS research.

Representative Robert Wexler (D-FL) said that Rice and Prez Bush made a total of 935 false public statements pre-9/11 in an orchestrated attempt to be misleading about the war. Rice said "I take my integrity very seriously."

White House Gaggle

White House Gaggle
Briefer: Dana Perino

President’s Schedule

President Bush had his normal briefings this morning at 8 am. At 1.05 pm, he will participate in a photo op with the 2007 NASCAR Nextel Cup Champion. He has also has a series of private meetings and policy time at 11 am.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino will brief the press at 12.15 pm today.

Super Tuesday

When asked if the President will stay up and watch the results come in, Perino said that she expects him to do what he usually does, which is watching a little bit of it but not stay up late and watch all the commentary. Perino said: “I think that there are a lot of unknown and fun to watch... Before there is a clear nominee, he is not going to comment on it. “

Russia

Perino was asked if the Administration was aware of the Russian prime minister candidate Mr. Medveded saying that Russia should emulate China in having its business invests in technology in other countries. Perino said that she had not heard those comments but the White House was aware and follow it.

France

Perino was asked if President Bush called the French President Sarkozy to congratulate him on his new marriage. Perino said that they have not spoken, however, the President and Mrs. Bush wish the newly weds well.

Chad

In response to a question on updates on the situation in Chad, Perino directed to the State Department and added that it is a very troubling situation and a lot of work needs to be done. “We remain very concerned. “ In a follow up a question regarding people leaving Darfur and going in to Chad, the refugee problem, and the UN’s request to the US for more assistance; Perino again referred to the State Department. “We have provided a significant amount of equipment and resources to that region, and we call on other countries to act as well,“ Perino said.

Prince Andrew

Perino was asked if the White House has a comment to British Prince Andrew’s statement that President Bush failed to listen to Britain during the Iraq war. Perino declined to comment.

Perino Speech

When asked about the speech she is giving later today at the National Italian-American Foundation, Perino said that she will speak of the President’s compassion agenda, the upcoming trip to Africa, and touch on the two pressing agendas; the economy and the FISA reauthorization.