Tuesday
Apr212009
Pakistan Potentially Poses Great Threat
By Suzia van Swol-University of New Mexico, Talk Radio News Service
Since Pakistan harbors international terrorists and controls a nuclear arsenal, the country poses the greatest threat to the Middle East, according to two Democrat U.S. Senators recently returned from the region.
During the April Congressional break, Sen. Jack Reed (RI) traveled with Sen. Ted Kaufman (DE) to Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The pair were in the Middle East from April 13th through April 20th to meet with leaders and officials.
In every country visited, the pair found "deficiencies in the local police,” Reed said, which inhibits Middle Eastern governments as well as the U.S. governments’ ability to truly assist the individuals and the countries.
Reed said that General David Petraeus, Commander U.S. Central Command, who was appointed by George W. Bush, faces very difficult decisions in terms of allocating resources.
“We are going to look very hard at the budget and the policy defense department to ensure that we have enough of these assets which are the critical enablers between both countries,” said Reed.
Senator Kaufman said that we (U.S.A) are at a pivot point in the region with the withdrawal in Iraq, increased U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and growing instability in Pakistan. “This is not just a military problem,” said Kaufman, suggesting that local police and political figures in the Middle East need to play a role alongside military efforts.
Since Pakistan harbors international terrorists and controls a nuclear arsenal, the country poses the greatest threat to the Middle East, according to two Democrat U.S. Senators recently returned from the region.
During the April Congressional break, Sen. Jack Reed (RI) traveled with Sen. Ted Kaufman (DE) to Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The pair were in the Middle East from April 13th through April 20th to meet with leaders and officials.
In every country visited, the pair found "deficiencies in the local police,” Reed said, which inhibits Middle Eastern governments as well as the U.S. governments’ ability to truly assist the individuals and the countries.
Reed said that General David Petraeus, Commander U.S. Central Command, who was appointed by George W. Bush, faces very difficult decisions in terms of allocating resources.
“We are going to look very hard at the budget and the policy defense department to ensure that we have enough of these assets which are the critical enablers between both countries,” said Reed.
Senator Kaufman said that we (U.S.A) are at a pivot point in the region with the withdrawal in Iraq, increased U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and growing instability in Pakistan. “This is not just a military problem,” said Kaufman, suggesting that local police and political figures in the Middle East need to play a role alongside military efforts.
Obama’s First 100 Days
Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) joined military leaders, interrogators, prosecutors, military experts and activists today to discuss how President Obama has tackled national security and international human rights issues during his first 100 days in office. Hagel, who endorsed Obama and traveled with him to the Middle East the presidential campaign, spoke at a conference hosted by Human Rights First in Washington, D.C.
Hagel said Obama’s efforts in Afghanistan, including plans to send as many as 17,000 additional troops, is “the smart thing, the right thing to do.”
Hagel said Obama is building a platform of relationships by reaching out to foreign countries to forge cooperation and common purpose in order to deal with “the great issues of our time.”
“We are in a world today that is essentially a global community,” said Hagel, adding that America must set a standard with regards to foreign relations.
The worst thing that any government can do for its people is to “try to cover things up,” said Hagel and he emphasized a need for accountability, transparency and clarity.
Hagel discussed some of his own foreign policy opinions including North Korea. Hagel said the question to ask is: “How do you most affectively influence the behavior of a government?” Hagel outlined bombing and sanctions as possible options but said that in North Korea’s case, six party talks “is the right process.” Six-party talks with the U.S., China, South Korea, North Korea, Japan, and Russia are meant to find a peaceful solution to North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. The talks originally resulted from North Korea’s decision decision to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to limit the spread of nuclear weapons.
Hagel warned that we have a very “unpredictable, unstable situation in North Korea that could affect a lot of things.” He went on to state that he believes “Bush was correct in initiating those six party talks.”