Thursday
Oct012009
Afghanistan And Pakistan Stability Linked, Say Experts
By Meagan Wiseley - University of New Mexico, Talk Radio News Service
In a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Thursday, expert witnesses agreed that the U.S. should neither abandon Afghanistan or substantially increase U.S. military forces in Afghanistan in regard to a stable Pakistan.
Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani Ambassador to the U.S. said, “a precipitous withdrawal would repeat the strategic mistake of the 1990s when the U.S. abandoned Afghanistan to the chaos that nurtured al-Qaida. Nor should the West risk being trapped in a Vietnam style quagmire, a war without end and with no guarantee of success.”
Steve Coll, President of the New America Foundation proposed a strategy that falls between withdrawal and militarization.
“It would make clear that the Taliban will never be permitted to take power by force in Kabul or major cities. It would seek and enforce stability in Afghan population centers, emphasize politics over combat, urban stability over rural patrolling, Afghan solutions over Western ones and it would incorporate Pakistan more directly into creative and persistent diplomatic efforts to stabilize Afghanistan and the region”, said Coll.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Ranking Member Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) introduced the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act, which Congress passed earlier this year, that will triple non-military assistance to Pakistan to $1.5 billion a year for the next five years.
Committee Chairman Kerry noted that “[U.S.] actions in Afghanistan will influence events in Pakistan and we must take that into account. But the ultimate choices about the country’s future will be made by the Pakistanis themselves.”
In a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Thursday, expert witnesses agreed that the U.S. should neither abandon Afghanistan or substantially increase U.S. military forces in Afghanistan in regard to a stable Pakistan.
Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani Ambassador to the U.S. said, “a precipitous withdrawal would repeat the strategic mistake of the 1990s when the U.S. abandoned Afghanistan to the chaos that nurtured al-Qaida. Nor should the West risk being trapped in a Vietnam style quagmire, a war without end and with no guarantee of success.”
Steve Coll, President of the New America Foundation proposed a strategy that falls between withdrawal and militarization.
“It would make clear that the Taliban will never be permitted to take power by force in Kabul or major cities. It would seek and enforce stability in Afghan population centers, emphasize politics over combat, urban stability over rural patrolling, Afghan solutions over Western ones and it would incorporate Pakistan more directly into creative and persistent diplomatic efforts to stabilize Afghanistan and the region”, said Coll.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Ranking Member Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) introduced the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act, which Congress passed earlier this year, that will triple non-military assistance to Pakistan to $1.5 billion a year for the next five years.
Committee Chairman Kerry noted that “[U.S.] actions in Afghanistan will influence events in Pakistan and we must take that into account. But the ultimate choices about the country’s future will be made by the Pakistanis themselves.”
Effective Counterinsurgency Strategy Necessary For Victory In Afghanistan, Says Expert
In a presentation Friday, President and CEO of the Institute For the Study of War Dr. Kimberly Kagan said that in order to accomplish President Barack Obama's stated mission in Afghanistan, which is to defeat, dismantle and destroy al-Qaida, then the U.S. must continue counterterrorism strategies and implement a counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan.
Commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal’s assessment of the War in Afghanistan stated that “the mission requires a better application of existing assets, but it also requires additional resources.”
A report released Friday by ISW states that there are not currently enough forces in Afghanistan to execute a proper counterinsurgency strategy and, in addition to requiring more forces, the U.S. must prioritize it’s objectives within Afghanistan.
According to ISW, counterinsurgency must focus on “critical population centers” including the central Hemland River Valley, Kandahar City, Tarin Kowt, Khost, Paktia and the region known as Greater Paktia.
A Research Analyst at ISW, Jeffrey Dressler, presented his report on Securing Hemland and said, “a comprehensive population-centric counterinsurgency strategy is actually what’s needed to gain the initiative, to secure the population and then to defeat the insurgency. This is going to require additional resources, time and a united effort between Afghan forces and the international community in Helmand.”
The ISW report also stated that “coalition counterinsurgency operations must be coordinated and mutually-reinforcing to achieve decisive effects and prevent the enemy from fleeing during the operation, only to return to the area later.”
President Obama is currently reviewing the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan and General McChrystal’s assessment.