myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
« Holder: GITMO On Track To Close, Detainees Could Transfer To Illinois | Main | Bernanke Warns Large Deficits Could Unhinge U.S. Economy »
Wednesday
Apr142010

Government Spending Watchdogs Release Annual Pork List

Citizens Against Government Waste released their annual summary of pork-barrel spending Wednesday, shining light on $16.5 billion in earmarks for projects the watchdog group deems unnecessary.

“[Members of Congress] have noticed it’s popular to posture as an anti-earmaker,” Tom Schatz, CAGW president said upon the summary's release. “Unfortunately ... most members of Congress still aren’t willing to eliminate the practice.”

Of the billions spent for pork projects, $490 million came from Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), who was named as one of the top “Oinkers,” or pork-pursuers, of 2010.

Democratic Senators also made it onto the watchdog’s radar. Tom Harkin (Iowa) and Robert Byrd (W. Va.) were both taken to task for seeking approximately $7,000,000 for projects named after them. Arlen Specter (Penn.) was chastised for securing $200,000 for a “small business incubator and multipurpose center.”

A bipartisan push by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas) and Rep. Ciro Rodriguez (D-Texas) also came under fire. The two Texans were grilled for an allocation of $693,000 for “beef improvement research.”

Hawaii came in at number one for the most pork spent per capita, with a projected $251.78 for each member of the state’s population. Alaska, who earned the dubious top spot last year, dropped to 4th on the list.

Although CAGW acknowledged that there has been a 15.5 percent decrease in pork-barrel spending from 2009, the organization notes that improvements still need to be made, both in the reduction of spending and overall transparency.

Reader Comments (2)

From your article (second paragraph): "anti-earmaker", (you forgot the "r")

I don't like nitt-picking, but when you write an article for all to read, shouldn't you take more care with your spelling. . . .

Spelling errors make me wonder if this article is serious or spam.......in my world this should have been spelled as such: "anti-earmarker". . . .

April 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterKELLI2L

Cons - There have been some complaints by people who claim that the shoe can be destroyed easily. This is seen after vigorous activity. wsrvxc wsrvxc - Red Wing Shoes.

December 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenteradoawz adoawz

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>