Tuesday
Jul142009
House Subcommittee Members Seek To Eliminate Mandatory Minimum Sentences For Drug Offenders
By Aaron Richardson
The House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held a hearing Tuesday to consider legislation that would eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders.
“The current sentencing requirements have failed to accomplish the legislative intent of the 1986 anti drug abuse act. We are wasting precious government resources on low level drug offenders. Moreover, the act has had a desolate impact on the African American community resulting in the incarceration of a disproportionate amount of African Americans often for many, many years," said Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tx.) gave his input on why eliminating minimum sentences could be dangerous to society as a whole.
“Judges should not be free to sentence felonies as misdemeanors. If there is no bottom to the range there will be more incidents where people will be killed or harmed because of light sentences.” said Gohmert.
Julie Stewart, President and Founder of Families Against Mandatory Minimums Foundation (FAMM), discussed the impact mandatory minimum sentences have had on the U.S.
“Since the passage of the Safety Valve which allows the courts to sentence below the mandatory minimum for a narrow band of drug defendants over 210,000 people have been sentenced federally to 5 or 10 year mandatory prison sentences. That’s an enormous number of families affected by these one size fits all sentences.” Said Stewart.
The House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held a hearing Tuesday to consider legislation that would eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders.
“The current sentencing requirements have failed to accomplish the legislative intent of the 1986 anti drug abuse act. We are wasting precious government resources on low level drug offenders. Moreover, the act has had a desolate impact on the African American community resulting in the incarceration of a disproportionate amount of African Americans often for many, many years," said Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tx.) gave his input on why eliminating minimum sentences could be dangerous to society as a whole.
“Judges should not be free to sentence felonies as misdemeanors. If there is no bottom to the range there will be more incidents where people will be killed or harmed because of light sentences.” said Gohmert.
Julie Stewart, President and Founder of Families Against Mandatory Minimums Foundation (FAMM), discussed the impact mandatory minimum sentences have had on the U.S.
“Since the passage of the Safety Valve which allows the courts to sentence below the mandatory minimum for a narrow band of drug defendants over 210,000 people have been sentenced federally to 5 or 10 year mandatory prison sentences. That’s an enormous number of families affected by these one size fits all sentences.” Said Stewart.
tagged FAMM, Minimum Sentences, Waters, drugs in Congress, News/Commentary
Waters Charged With Three Ethics Violations
The House Ethics Committee announced Monday that Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) is facing three counts of ethics violations.
The charges stem from accusations that the Congresswoman played a role in soliciting TARP funds for OneUnited, a bank that her husband had a combined total of 3,976 shares in.
“If OneUnited had not received this funding, [Waters’] husband’s financial interested in OneUnited would have been worthless,” a statement released by the committee reads.
The committee found that Waters behaved in a manner that did not reflect creditably on the House, and that she breached standards barring the exertion of influence for individual financial gain and the use of special favors.
In July, Waters motioned to have the charges dropped, citing the ethics committee’s decision last year to dismiss allegations that Republican Sam Graves (Mo.) benefited from failing to disclose his financial ties with witnesses he invited to testify before Congress. The committee denied Waters’ request.
The ethics committee’s response to Waters coincides with the upcoming trial for Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), who faces 13 alleged violations.