myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief

Entries in war on terror (18)

Thursday
Jul312008

Kerry: al-Qaeda more capable of attacking today

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) says terrorist attacks are currently at historic highs, stating that that al-Qaeda is more capable of attacking the United States now than it was in 2001. He says the next president should reform the war on terror and include more intelligence, making it possible to prevent terrorists from being recruited. (1:12)
Thursday
Jul312008

Kerry: Remember Bush’s military focus

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) says to let George W. Bush be remembered for an overly militarized focusing on fighting terrorism and to let the next president defeat terrorism by emphasizing America’s moral authority. (0:30)
Friday
Jul252008

Americans should be “outraged” with Bush Administration

At the House Judiciary Committee hearing on "Executive Power and Its Constitutional Limitations," Bruce Fein, Deputy Attorney General under President Reagan, said that many high crimes and misdemeanors were committed under the Bush Administration. He said that the executive branch “destroyed the Constitution” and the order of checks and balances that it supported. Fein explained that a claim of fighting terrorism can be used to arrest anyone without question and flout any restriction on gathering foreign intelligence. This means that the president can kidnap or detain anyone he thinks necessary, and open mail and burglarize homes if he thinks it necessary — a very “frightening power” according to Fein. Fein also said that “short of impeachment,” there is nothing Congress can do to punish the Bush Administration.

Vincent Bugliosi, the author of “Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder,” said he had evidence “beyond a reasonable doubt” that President Bush entered into war without good reason and is therefore guilty of murder. Bugliosi said that in 2002, the CIA told its officials that Saddam Hussein did not present imminent threats to the U.S. and published these findings in a white paper. However, Bugliosi explained that when the white paper was given to Congress, the part saying Hussein was not a threat was deleted. Because of this deletion, Bugliosi said that the Bush Administration got away with thousands upon thousands of murders in Iraq, exclaiming that Americans should be “outraged,” a statement which was greeted with applause from the public in attendance.

Jeremy Rabkin from the U.S. Institute of Peace tried to “add perspective” to the situation. He said that the “conspiracy charges” against the Bush Administration are “wildly improbable,” and tried to remind Congress that this situation is not unique to the Bush Administration. Rabkin said that the actions of the Bush Administration are much more understandable under the context of wartime and was “astonished” by the “tone in the room.” He also said that America’s enemies are not Democrats or Republicans but rather the “terrorists who want to kill us.”

Frederick Schwartz, Senior Counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, said that the Bush Administration abandoned the rule of law and has gotten away from the checks-and-balances structure of government. Schwartz said that because of the Bush Administration’s actions, America is “less free and less safe.” He said that the “full story” needs to be told, and an independent, bipartisan committee needs to look at what’s been done wrong and what’s been done right. Schwartz did not recommend impeachment because he said that it would make a mature, responsible, and detailed investigation impossible. He said that the U.S. must not adopt “the tactics of their enemies,” but rather strive for a “future that will be worthy of the best of our past.”
Tuesday
Jun172008

Military training misconstrued at Guantanamo

The origins of aggressive interrogation methods were discussed by the Senate Armed Services Committee. In his opening statement, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said methods used in US military programs that intend to help captured American forces resist violent interrogation through simulation have been twisted by military forces and used to interrogate. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) added that the Bush administration used “bizarre legal theories” to justify interrogation strategies and asserts that its decisions will be considered shortsighted in the future. Graham expressed concern with the Supreme Court’s decision that prisoners in Guantanamo Bay have the right to habeas corpus, saying that Americans will be disturbed to realize that they have the same constitutional rights as terrorists.

Dr. Jerald Ogrisseg, a former Air Force psychologist, said that the Air Force’s (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) SERE program is not intended to teach interrogation but rather to help captured Americans resist forms of interrogation used by states and parties that are not in compliance with the Geneva Convention. Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Daniel Baumgartner Jr. said a memo outlining physical pressures put on American prisoners-of-war sent to him by Ogrisseg was requested by the office of the Secretary of Defense. Both Baumgartner and Ogrisseg said they were under the impression that the Department of Defense wanted to determine appropriate interrogation procedures and had that they had no reason to assume the memo would be used to promote improper methods.

Ogrisseg said Navy SEALS subjected to brief waterboarding in training repeatedly stated they would divulge information to captors if faced with the waterboard again. Navy procedures allowed for trainees to be waterboarded for no more than 20 seconds with no more than two pints of water. Baumgartner said what the committee referred to as “SERE techiniques” are used often and have worked against American troops. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) stated that it would have been more logical for the Department of Defense to seek interrogation advice from the FBI instead of using a program not meant to teach interrogation. Senator Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) questioned the effectiveness of aggressive interrogation, pointing out the likelihood that captured terrorists have undergone training similar to that of United States Armed Forces.
Thursday
May082008

Not one more dime

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) expressed opposition today to supplemental funding for the Iraq war. Waters was supported by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) as well as the Progressive Democrats of America, who all stressed opposition to the supplemental funding and said they would not support it.

Waters and others stressed the fact that Congress needs to send a strong message to the President and the American people that they are serious about getting our troops out of Iraq and will not approve any legislation which gives one more dime to the Iraq war unless it is for the redeployment of American troops.

Waters said that the mismanagement of the Iraq war has caused too much damage and will not sign or support any bill that extends the war in Iraq or appropriates more money to the Iraq war. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) said that she would not support the bill and will add an amendment, similar to the Lee amendment, which would fence off funding to protect troops, contractors and fund a safe and responsible redeployment.

These representatives urged Congress to say no to the supplemental funding bill by Memorial day and not allocate one more dime to the war in Iraq. Former presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), also present at the hearing, is offering an amendment to the bill asking not to use the funds for future conflicts with Iran, Syria and Lebanon.