Obama Administration Needs To Work With Latin America

By Kayleigh Harvey - Talk Radio News Service

Sergio Bendixen, President of Bendixen and Associates; Dr Cynthia McClintock, Professor of political science and international affairs, and director of the Latin America and Hemispheric Studies Program at George Washington University, Eric Farnsworth, Vice-president of the Council of Americas and Ray Walser, senior policy analyst for Latin America in The Heritage Foundation's Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy studies, gave testimonies today before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere.

The witnesses created a lot of attention, with people lining up outside to hear the testimonies on "U.S. Policy Toward Latin America in 2009 and Beyond".

Congressman Gregory Meeks (D-NY), said: "You can tell by the way the room is filled today the interest in the Western Hemisphere".

Subcommittee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-NY) opened the hearing by welcoming Congressman Connie Mack (R-FL) as the committee's new Ranking Member and then outlined some positive steps he would like the Obama administration to pursue.

"First and foremost, I believe that President Obama's participation in April's Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago would send an extremely positive message to the heads of the state from Latin America, to the Caribbean. Second, as Chairman Berman moves forward with foreign aid reform and the Obama administration prepares its FY 2010 budget, it is essential that we increase funding for countries in the Western Hemisphere...Third, cooperation between the US and Brazil significantly expanded during the Bush Administration. This relationship needs to be further deepened under President Obama...Fourth, we must continue to support our friends in Mexico through the Merida Initiative...Fifth, I would urge President Obama to focus on Ecuador and Paraguay...and sixth, we must continue to support disaster recovery efforts in Haiti", Engel said.

Chairman Engel then went on to discuss the attacks in a synagogue in Caracus, Venezuela.

"On Monday, I sent a letter, along with 19 of my colleagues, to President Chavez urging him to end the bullying and harassment of the Jewish community in Venezuela and to extend the community the robust protection it deserves in light of the threats it faces. The Venezuelan government must quickly change its tune with regard to the country's Jewish community".

Dr McClintock said: "In Lationobarometer surveys between 2000 and 2005, approval ratings of the United States fell by more than 20 points in Ecuador, Chile, Brazil and Bolivia; more than 30 points in Mexico and Uruguay; and more than 40 points in Argentina, Paraguay, and Venezuela".

Ray Walser commented on America's dependence on the oil industry, with Congressman Ron Klein (D-FL) backing up his argument and stated that America needs to stop "buying oil from a country {Venezuela} that is hostile to our interests".

The committee also discussed the American economy and its ability to assist Latin American countries. Sergio Bendixen said: "We need to be realistic. Not only about what our friends want but what Latin America wants...we have economic limitations".

Other issues the committee discussed were the desires from the Obama administration, the April 2009 summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago, human rights in Cuba, immigration, drugs control and free trade.

Eric Farnsworth suggested in his testimony that Brazil and Mexico should be allowed to join the G8. "Listening to Latin America is important...the rest of the hemisphere also has good ideas".

Chairman Engel said: "We cannot ignore our own backyard".

The committee hearing ended after 120 minutes as Congress was called to vote.

Obama is weak on dictators says Hoekstra (R-Mich.)

Senator John McCain's (R-Ariz.) presidential campaign held a conference call on the one-year anniversary of Senator Barack Obama's (D-Ill.) declaration that he would hold diplomatic meetings with various dictators "without preconditions" once he becomes President.

Kori Schake, the senior foreign policy adviser for the McCain campaign said Obama does not understand the consequences of such a policy decision. Congressman Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) said if Obama carries out these negotiations with the leaders of Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and Syria, he would greatly undercut efforts to restrain the nuclear activities of those countries. Hoekstra said that Obama's intent to talk with those dictators sets him up with very high performance expectations. Upon Obama's assumption of the Presidency, his credibility would be tested immediately and his open approach to discussion with dictators puts him in a weakened position to deal with real threats to national security. Hoekstra contrasted Obama's plan with McCain's objective of having a strong, multilateral approach to prevent states from becoming nuclear powers.

Randy Scheunemann, another senior foreign policy adviser for the McCain campaign, said Obama's plan shows his inexperience, stubbornness, and malleability. He added that Obama's recent softening of his plan showed that the tried to change his position without the media noticing. (21:41)

America's Oil: Good to the last drop

By Ellen Ratner

As I sit here writing this column from the oil rich Middle East, I am reflecting on the political oil wars that we are hearing so much about from President Bush, Congress and the presidential candidates. Yet, no matter our favorite party, branch of government or candidate, the whole story is not being told.

During the last week in April, there were press briefings galore in Congress with words and accusations flying everywhere. The price of oil is killing our economy, small airlines are folding and larger ones are laying off employees or trying to merge. Trucks and their drivers are parading around the Capitol on a daily basis, honking horns and making it clear that it is difficult to survive with the gas prices so high.

The Democrats want the president to stop adding to the strategic oil reserve, which is 97 percent full. So far the president has not budged. The Democrats figure that it could save Americans 5 to 24 cents per gallon. Their plan put forward in four congressional bills includes holding OPEC accountable for price fixing (HR 2264), cracking down on gas price gouging (HR 1252), repealing subsidies to oil companies, investing in renewables (HR 5351) and developing new mileage standards (HR 6).



During several of the pressers, the Democrats rattled their swords. They pointed out that the Saudis had reduced their oil output by 800,000 barrels a day since 2005. Then came the threat, saying that Congress would "block their, (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE), lucrative arms deals." Of course Americans would be on the Democrats' side on this one. Why should we sell arms to countries that are making record profits? The answer is two words: Russia and China. Having just returned from Sudan, it is clear that as soon as the United States opts out of oil production, then China is going to opt in. If that means the price of entry is arms sales, then China and Russia are going to "pay that price" and sell arms. The threat of no arms sales sounds great to the Americans watching the evening news, but it is short sighted indeed.

All of this saber rattling took place against the backdrop of Exxon Mobil releasing its quarterly profits, which are a whopping $10.25 billion for the quarter. The numbers look great for oil investors now, but there are clouds over the horizon, and the large investors are well aware of the darkening cloud cover.

That cloud is called Hubbert's peak. M. King Hubbert predicated in the mid '50s that the world was reaching peak oil production and that the United States would reach it by 1970. He was laughed at and disregarded. Hubbert was right, and one member of Congress has been the lone voice for Hubbert's Peak and the implications that it brings. That member is Republican scientist Roscoe Bartlett from Maryland. As the lone wolf he has said, "You can't pump what is not there." This might explain why there is less oil being pumped from Saudi Arabia. They might be close to peak oil production. There was a stated increase in Saudi "oil reserves" about 10 years ago, but there is no data real data to back up this alleged "find." Saudi Arabia going dry is a very scary situation for the economy and Middle Eastern stability, and cutting off arms sales isn't going to change that fact.

Ordering GAO studies, Rep. Bartlett has continually been on the floor of the House showing graphs and pushing for renewables and alternative energy sources. He was also first out of the box to discuss what he terms as the "investment risk" of doing business with countries that have the largest proven reserves and carry the most political risk. Those just happen to be Iran, Iraq, Nigeria and Venezuela. He has many ideas, including plans for the U.S. to achieve energy independence. One is a bill for "net metering" which encourages Americans to sell back any energy they produce using solar, wind and other alternative energy sources.

There are numerous ways to mitigate the effects of peak oil in the U.S. or anywhere else, but these require long-term planning, investment and action. Idle threats such as cutting off arms sales or stopping CEOs from taking home more bacon are not going to address the problem. Rep. Bartlett has been saying what no one wants to hear. It is time we paid attention.