Official Pledges Commitment In Afghanistan
President Barack Obama’s Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Wednesday that the proposed July 2011 troop withdrawal date marks only the beginning of a gradual, transitional phase for Afghanistan and its military.
Holbrooke was pushed to give members his own “vision” of when the United States can expect a “full, absolute withdrawal” of troops from Afghanistan after they argued that a three to five year prospective timeline made by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too long” a period.
“I am very wary of setting a specific date for absolute withdrawal,” he said.
Holbrooke said that the United States must continue to support the economic development of Afghanistan and the training of the country’s police and military forces.
“A sustainable transition will be a gradual one [and] we continue to fulfill our obligation to train the police and the military,” he said.
Strategies regarding the transition from America’s military presence to a civilian assistance campaign are already being implemented but Holbrooke added that this process will be expensive and it will not happen overnight.
“This will not be cheap, but it will be a fraction of the money that is now being authorized for the military campaign,” he said. “If we walk away from Afghanistan again, as we did 21 years ago, the consequences will be catastrophic because of the unique strategic position of Afghanistan and the reaction that would have in Pakistan.”
Afghanistan Needs Continued American Commitment, Says Official
Philip Bunnell - Talk Radio News Service
Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke told the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that if the United States is going have a successful run in Afghanistan, its commitment and investment must continue unwavered.
Holbrooke said strengthening the Afghan government and weeding out corruption is critical if President Obama’s war strategy is to succeed.
“The steps we’ve taken so far to fight corruption is a start,” said Holbrooke, citing the multiple recent arrests of corrupt Afghan officials. Despite the progress, Holbrooke acknowledges that there was still a lot of work to do in erasing corruption within the Afghan government.
One of the keys to a stronger Afghan government, Holbrooke said, is an effective transfer of control from US and NATO forces to locals. He said that, without a commitment to a smooth transfer, “the process will not move forward.”
Holbrooke stressed that persistent investment in the Afghan military and police forces and the economic development of the country is vital. Accomplishing these goals will require “continued American commitment,” and patience even after American troops have left the country.
Holbrooke’s testimony comes in wake of wavering Democratic support for the war in Afghanistan, including a vote for an additional $37 billion in war spending that 106 House Democrats voted against.
Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), one of the opposing Democrats, questioned the validity of the United States’ mission in Afghanistan. Moran recounted his recent visit to Afghanistan where he was told that from the perspective of some Afghan tribal leaders, the United States “didn’t liberate Marja, the Taliban liberated it from a corrupt police chief who was preying on his own people.”