myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief

Entries in New START Treaty (4)

Wednesday
Nov172010

Secretary Clinton Implores GOP TO Back New START Treaty

By A.J. Swartwood

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appeared on Capitol Hill Wednesday to implore Senate Republicans to support the New START Treaty’s ratification before the end of lame duck session.

The comments came a day after Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), citing concern that the lame duck session would not provide adequate time to resolve all the concerns related to the treaty, announced his opposition to a vote.

“Some have suggested that we hit the pause button, that it is too difficult to do this in a lame duck session. I strongly disagree,” said Secretary Clinton. “This is exactly what the American people expect us to do, to come together and do what is necessary to protect our country.”

Clinton, who spoke alongside the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Dick Lugar (R-Ind.), remains confident that despite the initial setback, the New START Treaty can be passed before the start of the new year.

“We intend to do everything we can during this lame duck session, to get a vote to ratify this treaty,” said Clinton. “This is not an issue that can afford to be postponed…We think once we take that message with the urgency that you heard from the three of us, we will get the votes, and we will pass this treaty.”

Tuesday
Jul202010

DoD Official Assures Skeptical McCain On START

By Rob Sanna - Talk Radio News Service

Multiple members of the Senate Armed Services Committee today expressed deep concerns over elements of the new START Treaty, saying they have doubts regarding the trustworthiness of Russia.   

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) cited a Russian unilateral statement, which said the nation would pull out of the treaty if there is any build up in U.S. missile defense. McCain also pointed to a statement issued by U.S. officials promising to deploy missile defense to protect against nuclear attack. 

“I still don’t know how you reconcile those two statements,” McCain told Dr. James N. Miller, Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense under Pentagon chief Robert Gates.

Miller replied that the current U.S. missile defense system is far from a threat to Russia.

“We have 30 ground to air interceptors, we have a long way to go before we have any capability that’s close to affecting the strategic stability of the balance. They will have over 1000 warheads with new START.”

Miller praised the treaty, arguing that it will promote stability and transparency within U.S-Russian strategic relations. He added that it would allow the U.S to deploy non-nuclear global strike capabilities.

New START would not affect the U.S.’ ability to renew and rebuild nuclear enterprise, nor would it affect the ability to improve ballistic missile defense capabilities, Miller added.

Monday
Jul192010

START Provisions Could Weaken U.S. Missile Defense, Say Experts

By Rob Sanna - Talk Radio News Service

Vague language in parts of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) could limit the United States’ ability to improve its missile defense system, according to experts at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C..

Currently the treaty would link missile defense limits to limits on offensive missile systems. Russian officials are using this to claim that their nation has the right to ignore the treaty and increase their nuclear missile count if the United States upgrades or expands its missile defense system in any way (provide a link to a story that confirms this).

“It was so important to the Russians, this one piece of preamble langauge in the treaty, that on the day the treaty was signed they released a unilateral statement saying that ‘Based on this preambluar language, the United States cannot…enhance its missle defenses, otherwise we’re going to withdraw under article 14,’” said Steven Groves with the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C..

Henry Sokolski, Executive Director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, said the U.S. should stop confronting Russia, but instead should try to work with the Russians on issues such as growing weapon stocks in China. He said the U.S. should support denuclearizing some of its warheads if Russia and China agree to do the same.

In addition to the START treaty, Sokolski recommended that the U.N. begin to impose heavy sanctions on nations that violate nuclear agreements.

He also noted that it would be very helpful for the U.S. to use economic leverage over nuclear suppliers like China, Russia, France, Japan, and Korea. Currently, these nations are selling reactors unregulated in the Middle East, effectively under-cutting the restraints the U.S. is pushing for.

Thursday
Jun172010

Gates, Clinton Say No Secret Negotiations Taking Place On START

By Sarah Mamula
Talk Radio News Service

Though U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Dimitry Medvedev signed the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) in Prague this past April, Congress has to yet to ratify.

Appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton defended START, saying it will limit strategic offensive arms in both the U.S. and Russia in order to ensure stability and predictability between the two nations that together, possess 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons.

Despite bipartisan enthusiasm for ratification, Ranking Member John McCain (R-Ariz.) said he has concerns over the potential constraints in missile defense due to the inclusion of Article 5, as well as a unilateral statement made by Russia at the time of the signing that stated Russia would only validate START if the U.S. halted its defense missile build-up.

“That is a strong statement at the time of the signing,” said McCain.

Clinton, however, downplayed its significance, telling the committee, “We are not bound by it. In fact, we’ve issued our own statement making clear that the United States intends to continue improving and deploying effective missile defense systems.”

Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, who also testified, agreed with Clinton’s view that neither Article 5 nor Russia's statement would affect U.S. missile defense capabilities.

According to Gates, the new START retains U.S. power to maintain, modernize and deploy “the most effective missile defenses possible.”

When questioned about a recent press report claiming that secret negotiations regarding restrictions on defense missiles were occurring, Clinton defended the transparency of the U.S.-Russia negotiations on the treaty.

“There is no secret deal,” she stressed. “There is no plan to limit U.S. missile defenses in this treaty.”