Bill Would Prohibit Lame Duck Action
While much of the focus on Capitol Hill this week centered on GOP efforts to repeal the healthcare law and cut spending, one Republican introduced legislation aimed at bringing an end to so-called ‘lame duck’ sessions.
The End the Lame Duck Act, sponsored by Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Ks.), would prohibit Congress from doing business during the roughly two month period that falls in between a general election and the start of the next Congress.
According to a summary of the bill, “Prior to the general election, Congress would adjourn, until the commencement of the next Congress. Any appropriation bills not passed by Election Day would be subject to a continuing resolution at the previous fiscal year’s level. Only a declared national emergency, which requires the agreement of both the majority and minority leadership, would allow Congress to be called into session.”
During the recently concluded lame duck session, Democrats led a furious charge to pass important legislation, including a continuation of the Bush era tax cuts, a repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy and a key nuclear arms agreement between the U.S. and Russia.
Throughout the short session, Republicans criticized their counterparts for scheduling such significant votes during the lame duck, rather than waiting until the 112th Congress convened. Republicans picked up 63 seats in the House during the November elections, giving them control of the lower chamber in the new session.
It is unlikely that Jenkins’ bill - should it pass through the House - will go anywhere in the Senate. Still, the congresswoman hopes to attract bipartisan support for it, pointing out that “this Republican majority will be the first to lose the ability to abuse the lame duck session after the 2012 general election.”


