McCain Wary Of New Missile Defense Plan

by Julianne LaJeunesse- University of New Mexico

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) expressed concern Thursday that the recent decision by the Obama administration to scrap a long-range missile defense system in Eastern Europe could signal that the U.S. is willing to concede to Russian interests.

"There is very little doubt, that in most of the world, that this is viewed as an attempt to gain Russian concessions on the Iranian nuclear issue," McCain said during a Senate Foreign Affairs Committee hearing. "That's the interpretation. It was Machiavelli that said 'It's not what you do, it's what you appear to do.'"

During the hearing, McCain questioned the Defense Department's motives for changing the 2007 long-range missile plan in Poland and the Czech Republic. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates originally created the Bush administration's plan, and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy said that she personally saw the deliberation Gates put into the Obama administration's new short-range missile plan.

At the hearing, McCain said some of the newspaper accounts he's read lead him to believe the international community doesn't buy the Department of Defense's arguments about the technological benefits of short-range missiles in Europe, noting that the time it will take to implement new technologies will be time the United States and European allies will be left with weakened military defenses.

McCain added that he's curious about how new U.S. missile policies will affect Polish and Czech policies.

"I think it's worth noting the Czech Republic currently have NATO forces deployed, as well as 100 personal deployed in Kandahar," he said. "The Polish currently have 2, 000 troops in Afghanistan. I would be very interested in the future to see how firmly the Poles and the Czechs stand behind those commitments."

McCain went on to argue that he agrees building and using defenses against short-range missiles are needed, but not because of the "belligerent threats the Iranian regime continues to pose to the United States and the rest of the world."

Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he believed the new short-range missile approach is positive because it "addresses more directly and effectively Iran's missile threat, it maintains and expands our security commitment to Europe, including Poland and the Czech Republic, [and] it opens the door to working cooperatively with Russia on a missile defense system that could not only provide greater protection to Europe, but also make a strong statement to Iran, that Europe, including Russia will take unified action against Iran's threat."

Senators Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) and Jack Reed (D-R.I.) shared many of Sen. McCain's views, with Lieberman asking why the U.S. cannot adopt a dual system with short and long-range missiles.

What is the future of combat systems?

By Suzia van Swol-University of New Mexico, Talk Radio News Service
Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) said that “for over nearly eight years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan we’ve watched with pride and gratitude the magnificent performance of America’s land forces,” and that we have not done enough to support our ground forces transformation or to prepare them to meet future threats.

At the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the current and future goals of the U.S. military land power, Lieberman said that it is the intent of these hearings to identify requirements for land and air power as part of the committee’s primary responsibility to authorize funding for the programs for air and land power that they conclude are necessary to provide for the common defense.

Lieberman said that the question we need to ask is, “What is the future of the future combat systems program?” He said that the defense budget faces pressure because of the need to reset the equipment that has been used in our ongoing wars while also shifting new resources to support the fight in Afghanistan.

Andrew Krepinevich, President for the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments said that “what we need is a rebalanced army, but the kind of army that we are looking at right now is in my estimation far too rebalanced and oriented on traditional conventional military operations.”

Thomas Donnelly, Resident Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, said that administrations of both parties have wanted to preserve American leadership in a global sense. Donnelly said that “the outcome of this war is critical to us” and “the primary instrument that we have to achieve that success is our land forces.”

Donnelly says that we need to have an active duty army that is somewhere about the size that it was at the end of the Cold War, which was approximately 780,000.

Tackling Crime, Drugs and Money Laundering on the Border

By Kayleigh Harvey - Talk Radio News Service

At the Senate Judiciary Committee on “Southern Border Violence: Homeland Security Threats, Vulnerabilities and Responsibilities,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that “incidents of transnational violence are, unfortunately, not a new phenomenon,” when looking at issues relating to the southwest border. She warned, “What is occurring in Mexico now is violence of a level that we have not seen before.”

Asked by Chairman Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) whether, as Secretary of Homeland Security, she considered Mexican drug cartel violence a real threat to the homeland security of the United States. Secretary Napolitano agreed with this statement.

In a prepared statement Mr. Ogden said, “The explosion of violence along the Southwest border is being caused by a limited number of large, sophisticated and vicious criminal organizations, not by individual drug traffickers acting in isolation.”

Mr. Ogden added that the Department for Justice aimed to “identify, disrupt and dismantle the Mexican drug cartels,” including “extensive and coordinated intelligence capabilities...prosecuting criminals responsible for the smuggling, kidnapping and violence in federal court.”

In a prepared statement Mr. Steinberg said, “drug related assassinations and kidnapping have reached unprecedented levels.”

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) called the current situation of growing violence on the border “a sad state of affairs.”