Monday
Feb042008
Talking Points: HHS Secretary Leavitt on FY2009 budget
Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Leavitt began his press conference on the FY2009 budget by warning that Medicare in its current form will be bankrupt within 11 years. Unlike Social Security, which he called "a math problem," Medicare will need to be heavily reformed in order to remain functional. He said that some people will see this budget's attempts to bring Medicare "into a more sustainable" form as a cut, but the changes in the new budget are aimed at improving the program's sustainability by improving efficiency and bringing in market forces, citing the Medicare prescription drug reforms as a positive example. He also said that the changes reduce the premiums that beneficiaries pay.
Leavitt also said work needed to be done to remove the tax discrimination against people who do not buy health insurance through their employer, saying up to an additional 20 million people might be covered if that change were made.
Leavitt said that the SCHIP program retains coverage of people with gross incomes of up to 200% of the poverty line, and it allows states to cover people up to 250% of the poverty line.
Leavitt also said work needed to be done to remove the tax discrimination against people who do not buy health insurance through their employer, saying up to an additional 20 million people might be covered if that change were made.
Leavitt said that the SCHIP program retains coverage of people with gross incomes of up to 200% of the poverty line, and it allows states to cover people up to 250% of the poverty line.
tagged budget, fda, hhs, medicade, medicare, mike leavitt, schip, tax in News/Commentary
House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hold hearing today on "Ketek Clinical Study Fraud: What did Aventis know?"
Ms. Ann Marie Cisneros, Former Senior Clinical Research Associate at PPD, Inc., testified that Aventis knew that there was something wrong with Dr. Kirkman-Campbell’s findings and did nothing. Cisneros states that a number of “red flags” were apparent, including discrepancies with every informed consent, one consent that was “blatantly forged,” and the fact that she enrolled her entire staff in the study. Cisneros summed up her view of Dr. Kirkman-Campbell by stating that she only seemed interested in getting more business from Aventis as an investigator to conduct more and more clinical tests, receiving $400 per patient tested. One point of interest was the fact that even when Cisneros reported her findings to Copernicus, an Independent Review Board (IRB), she said that Copernicus “never did audit or blacklist the site, or report any irregularities to the FDA.”
Following Ms. Cisneros, Special Agent Douglas Loveland, Office of Criminal Investigation of the FDA, described Dr. Kirkland-Campbell as sloppy, and the fact that Aventis was willing to submit “sloppy data” reflected poorly on the company. Loveland stated what actually made it difficult to bring Aventis to court was the fact that the FDA wants reliable data, and “sloppy or fraudulent data is not reliable.” Aventis used sloppy data so that they would not have to throw up a “fraud flag,” which would make the fraud more easily detectable. Aventis proceeded with releasing the inaccurate data even though they themselves had written up 11 different sites where they believed erroneous studies took place.