Monday
Jul142008
The middle class can expect big retirement troubles
A study from Ernst and Young on the likelihood of new retirees outliving their financial aspects was discussed in a conference call this afternoon. Joe Reali, chairman of Americans for Secure Retirement, claimed the study found that the majority of middle class retirees will outlive their retirement benefits.
According to Tom Neubig, who represented Ernst and Young, 6 of ten new retirees will not be able to maintain their current standard of living when drawing from available retirement resources, and many will be forced to cut their spending during retirement by about one third. He went on to say that those retiring with a guaranteed source of income like a structured payment package will fare much better than others.
Larry Mitchell, director of legislative affairs for the American Corn Growers Association, added that many who work in farming are forced to take on additional jobs to earn income due to financial worries. Most of these jobs offer little or no retirement benefits. As such, farm workers across the nation are having an increasingly difficult time earning adequate retirement benefits, and with the release of this new study the situation appears only to be getting worse.
According to Tom Neubig, who represented Ernst and Young, 6 of ten new retirees will not be able to maintain their current standard of living when drawing from available retirement resources, and many will be forced to cut their spending during retirement by about one third. He went on to say that those retiring with a guaranteed source of income like a structured payment package will fare much better than others.
Larry Mitchell, director of legislative affairs for the American Corn Growers Association, added that many who work in farming are forced to take on additional jobs to earn income due to financial worries. Most of these jobs offer little or no retirement benefits. As such, farm workers across the nation are having an increasingly difficult time earning adequate retirement benefits, and with the release of this new study the situation appears only to be getting worse.
New Hunger Report Suggests Ending Farm Subsidies
By Lisa Kellman
The group Bread for the World released its “2012 Hunger Report” Monday, which argues against cutting U.S. food and farm aid budgets.
Officials associated with the report held a press conference at the National Press Club to discuss solving issues within some of the nation’s current food and farm policies.
With the ‘super committee’s’ Wednesday deadline to slash $1.2 trillion from the federal deficit approaching, the heads of congressional agriculture committees have devised a plan to save $23 billion over the next five years by making cuts from programs under their jurisdiction.
David Beckman, president of Bread for the World Institute, supported saving money by shifting away from direct farm subsidy payments and toward a more “comprehensive revenue insurance” system in order to help with farm risk management.
However, he also voiced concern over making conservation programs and food stamp funding part of the $23 billion cut.
“Because our food and farm policy have been so driven by special interests, they’re suboptimal in almost every respect,” argued Beckman, “Bread for the World’s most urgent recommendation is that Congress not cut SNAP food assistance in order to pay for wasteful farm subsidies.”
Many other panelists called for an end to farm subsidies and other harmful issues.
“We can dramatically improve the health and well being of our population, provide a safety net to farmers, farm sustainably and in an environmentally sound way for less money than we’re spending right now, if we had the courage to face down the special interests that time and again frustrate reform,” argued Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group.
Cook cited as an example, Congress’ revised agriculture appropriations bill last week, which counts tomato sauce in pizza as a vegetable and was pushed furtively by frozen pizza lobbyists.
The report also proposed increased funding to child nutrition programs, an additional commitment to aid hunger and food security abroad, and a proposal called “Ag jobs” that would create a guest farm worker program for immigrant laborers.
“All this can be done and you could save a lot more than the $23 billion,” said Beckman.