Friday
Sep262008
Obama energized about energy plan
Sen. Barack Obama's energy plan is "more robust" than Sen. John McCain's plan said Obama Senior Campaign Adviser Kenneth Berlin at a discussion forum. He said that Obama's plan was more aggressive in combatting climate change, and radical change in energy policy was needed because "we are falling behind."
Berlin said that both campaigns have made energy reform a big part of their campaign. According to Berlin, One difference between Obama and McCain is that Obama's goal would be to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent while McCain only wants to reduce those same emissions by 60 percent.
There are some myths about Obama's energy policy said Berlin. Obama has "strong support for clean coal technology," which Berlin said has been lied about in this campaign. He also said that Obama does support the development of nuclear power if the United States can deal with the issue of proliferation, and find a clean and secure way to get rid of nuclear waste.
Berlin said that both campaigns have made energy reform a big part of their campaign. According to Berlin, One difference between Obama and McCain is that Obama's goal would be to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent while McCain only wants to reduce those same emissions by 60 percent.
There are some myths about Obama's energy policy said Berlin. Obama has "strong support for clean coal technology," which Berlin said has been lied about in this campaign. He also said that Obama does support the development of nuclear power if the United States can deal with the issue of proliferation, and find a clean and secure way to get rid of nuclear waste.
The future of health care
According to last week's poll by the Los Angeles Times asking readers which candidate was best fit to take care of health care, Obama received 54 percent approval, while McCain passed with 25 percent. Obama's plan would mandate employers to cover their employees and mandatory for children. McCain's plan would cause employers to lose their tax exclusion and would leave the current tax and insurance system intact.
Dr. Uwe Reinhardt, a professor of economics and public policy at the Woodrow Wilson school, showed GDP charts that spanned the past four president's terms and estimated the expenditures to reform not only health care, but the whole insurance market approximately $298.7 billion. Reinhardt said that America cannot afford the changes necessary for universal health care, "We can no longer afford to be our brother or sister's keeper."
Dr. Robert Moffit, senior fellow of the Heritage Foundation, said that America is "doing many things right" as far as health care goes. He said that the U.S. is a leader in medical science and technology, as well as pharmaceuticals and vaccines. He said the real problem with America's health system is really its financing and tax policy. His conclusion was that health insurance must become accessible for individuals regardless of employment.
John Rother, the AARP's Executive Vice President for Policy, outlined five necessary elements for the health care reform discussion. He advocated a federal regulatory agency to oversee health care with congressional oversight. He also had a warned for the next president, "Unless health care reform is luanched in the first year of the President's term, it is not likely to succeed."