Increasing Payroll Taxes Would Preserve Social Security, Say Dems

A group of four Democrats partnered on Wednesday to unveil legislation aimed at protecting Social Security benefits for America’s seniors.

Republicans have lately been citing government reports showing that the popular entitlement could run out of money by 2038, and most of the GOP candidates for President have embraced the idea of restructuring the program for younger Americans. Some Democrats, however, have argued that drastically reforming the program is a bad idea.

“Despite a lot of right wing rhetoric to the contrary, Social Security is not going broke and has not contributed one penny to our serious deficit problem,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

(Click here to see photos from today’s press conference)

Currently, Social Security is funded through payroll taxes paid by employers and employees. The cap on annual income subject to the tax is $106,800. According to the Social Security Administration, the program currently has a $2.5 trillion surplus and the Congressional Budget Office has reported that it can pay out every benefit to every eligible American for the next 27 years.

The Keeping Our Social Security Promises Act, proposed by Sanders, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) would strengthen Social Security’s coffers by applying the tax to any income generated over $250,000 per year. The concept, as noted by Sanders, was advocated for by President Obama back in 2008, who called for raising the payroll tax on wealthy Americans.

“This is a simple fix. It solves the whole problem in a way that should be embraced by everyone,” Boxer said.

Tension arose when a reporter asked the lawmakers to weigh in on President Obama’s recent proposal in the American Jobs Act to extend the payroll tax cut for another year.

“Do I think the middle class deserve a tax break in the midst of this horrendous recession?” Sanders asked. “I d, but I would very much prefer it not come from continuing the cuts that we’re seeing in the payroll taxing.”

Boxer, however, was adamant that the payroll tax cut bill has legislation built within it to restore funds. 

Yet as Boxer was defending the payroll tax cut, DeFazio was shaking his head in rejection of her claim that the funds would be restored.

“No more tax cuts,” Defazio declared angrily. “We have the economy that tax cuts will give us and it is pretty pathetic, isn’t it?”

Obama’s proposed extension of the payroll tax cut holiday has received criticism from both sides of the aisle.