Censure Or Reprimand, Rangel's Fate In Hands Of Congress

As Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) awaits a decision from his colleagues in the House on whether he will be censured or reprimanded for being found guilty of 11 ethics violations, he’s taken it upon himself to give his fellow representatives reasons to administer the less severe of the two. 

The Hill is reporting that a letter is being circulated to members by Rangel’s office titled “Ten Reasons Why Rep. Charles Rangel Should Not Receive Censure.” The letter argues that a censure is too sever a punishment based on precedents. 

The number one reason to support a reprimand over a censure, “Rep. Rangel has not been convicted with any crime,” according to the document.

Despite previous attempts by Rangel to the Ethics Committee to recommend a less severe punishment, the committee thought it appropriate to censure the embattled Harlem Democrat. Now, his fate lies in the hands of Congress as they are expected to vote as early as today on the prospective censure. 

10 Reasons Why Rangel Should NOT Receive Censure