myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
« HUD Secretary Asks House For Greater Commitment To Housing | Main | Attorney General Holder Throws His Support Behind Hate Crime Legislation »
Thursday
Jun252009

Boehner Accuses Pelosi Of Killing Jobs And Creating More CO2 Through Waxman-Markey Support

By Sam Wechsler-Talk Radio News Service

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) voiced strong opposition Thursday to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) support of the American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as the Waxman-Markey bill.

Boehner began a press conference Thursday asking, “Where are the jobs?”, complaining that three million jobs have already been lost this year and that new jobs are not coming from government spending but from small businesses. He then stated that the upcoming Waxman-Markey bill would force small businesses to pay more for high energy and cost 2.3 to 2.7 million Americans their jobs.

“Mark my words, the American people are going to remember this vote. This will be a defining moment and a defining vote in this Congress,” said Boehner. 

The Minority Leader argued that the bill will not cause carbon dioxide emissions to decrease, but will instead result in an increase. Once the high energy sector jobs have been shipped overseas, the energy companies in India and China will import more American coal, Boehner explained. He added that since China and India do not have the technology America does, when the country burns the coal to produce energy they will create five times more carbon dioxide emissions than if the coal was burned in the U.S.

“[Waxman-Markey] is the most convoluted idea I’ve ever seen,” Boehner said.

Reader Comments (2)

And at another point later in the press conference, Mr. Boehner claimed that we will end up shipping our coal to be burned in China. And then he made the surprising assertion that the same coal burned in China would produce FIVE TIMES as much CO2 as if that coal were burned in the U.S.

This might be called the "New Republican Chemistry"... :-)

June 25, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBarry

Oops -- I should have read to the end of the post above!

Still the chemistry is interesting...

June 25, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBarry

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>