myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
« Making American protection compatible with Iraqi sovereignty | Main | Don’t drop the medicine ball »
Wednesday
Jul232008

Don't Ask, Don't Tell effects military cohesiveness

"I may be straight, but not narrow" said Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.) at a heated review of the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy before the House Armed Services Committee, Military Personnel Subcommittee. This was the first time in 15 years that the policy had been revisited since its creation in 1993.

Retired Marine Corps. Staff Sgt. and first wounded soldier during the Iraq War Eric Alva, stated that trust was the most important bond he shared with his fellow soldiers, and that when he admitted to them that he was gay, trust and cohesion in the group only strengthened.

Joan Darrah, a retired Navy Captain, echoed Alva's sentiments, saying that she was constantly forced to live a double life while serving. After leaving a room in the Pentagon that was destoryed only minutes later on the morning of 9/11, Darrah realized that her partner of 11 years would have been the last to know, had she been killed. Due to the policy, she said that she was very secretive about her life as a lesbian, not even listing her partner as an emergency contact. In addition, Darrah said that the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy actually hurts troop cohesion by mandating the immediate removal of soldiers who are found to be gay.

Brian Jones, a former Army Special Operations and current business owner and Chief Financial Officer defended Don't Ask Don't Tell by saying that certain military situations require a closeness that could be uncomfortable for heterosexual soldiers, pointing to communal showers and even the need to huddle together for warmth, which he stated can result in the sexual arousal of gay soldiers.

Elaine Donnelly, President of the Center for Military Readiness said that by removing the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, heterosexual soldiers would be pushed into a situation she called "forced cohabitation". She also stated that by allowing openly gay soliders to fight alongside straight soldiers, the government would be putting an unfair burden on Americans with religious convictions.

Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.), a member of congress who has served in the US military, exressed sharp criticism of Donnelly for remarks that he said implied that the US Army was not professional enough to to work alongside gay soldiers.

Reader Comments (1)

"...certain military situations require a closeness that could be uncomfortable for heterosexual soldiers." Then give these soldier training to help them get over THEIR PROBLEM.

"...communal showers and even the need to huddle together for warmth, which he stated, can result in the sexual arousal of gay soldiers."

How would he know what sexually arouses a gay soldier?

Mr. Jones is telling us about HIS insecurities and short comings and says nothing about gay soldiers serving in the military.

Ms. Donnelly's comment: "the government would be putting an unfair burden on Americans with religious convictions," totally mistates the purpose of the military. Killing other people is a burden on people with real religious convictions. Loving another man is not a "burden." If someone's religious "convictions" are burdened by gays in the military, then the religious soldier needs to avoid service in the interest of unit effectiveness.

The immaturity and insecurity these people express cannot excuse the bigotry they express. They need to grow up.

July 24, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterldfrmc

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>