Monday
Apr072008
Heritage Foundation speakers say NATO is crucial to international security
Staff
The Heritage Foundation hosted a discussion entitled "Post Bucharest: NATO and the Future of the Transatlantic Alliance" to discuss the recent developments of the treaty agreement in light of last week's Bucharest summit.
Liam Fox, shadow secretary of state for defense in the United Kingdom, outlined the British conservative party's vision for NATO, which consisted of a unification and reinforcement of the treaty and more equal contributions from all members. Fox criticized the European Union's Lisbon Treaty, which he called a virtually renamed version of the previously rejected European Constitution, as well as talk of a potential EU pillar within NATO on the grounds that both threaten to undermine NATO's primacy and thus international security. He also refuted claims that NATO was no longer necessary in the post-Cold War world by stating the world is involved in a larger global network with shared interests and proliferating threats.
Kurt Volker, the nominee for U.S. ambassador to NATO, summarized the U.S. government's perspective of the Bucharest summit and its vision for NATO. Volker, like Fox, called for greater European investment in defense. He confirmed that NATO is prepared to accept Macedonia as a member as soon as it changes its unpopular name. He also emphasized that NATO desires to work in conjunction with Russia, not against it.
Both Fox and Volker called for an elimination of the gap between those who fight and those who fund NATO missions, emphasizing that NATO's success depends upon the cooperative efforts of all its members.
Listen
Liam Fox, shadow secretary of state for defense in the United Kingdom, outlined the British conservative party's vision for NATO, which consisted of a unification and reinforcement of the treaty and more equal contributions from all members. Fox criticized the European Union's Lisbon Treaty, which he called a virtually renamed version of the previously rejected European Constitution, as well as talk of a potential EU pillar within NATO on the grounds that both threaten to undermine NATO's primacy and thus international security. He also refuted claims that NATO was no longer necessary in the post-Cold War world by stating the world is involved in a larger global network with shared interests and proliferating threats.
Kurt Volker, the nominee for U.S. ambassador to NATO, summarized the U.S. government's perspective of the Bucharest summit and its vision for NATO. Volker, like Fox, called for greater European investment in defense. He confirmed that NATO is prepared to accept Macedonia as a member as soon as it changes its unpopular name. He also emphasized that NATO desires to work in conjunction with Russia, not against it.
Both Fox and Volker called for an elimination of the gap between those who fight and those who fund NATO missions, emphasizing that NATO's success depends upon the cooperative efforts of all its members.
Listen
Reader Comments