Wednesday
Jul092008
FISA: Telecom immunity okay
The Senate passed the update to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that grants immunity to telecom companies from lawsuits with a 69-28 vote.
Before the vote, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said, in his opening statement, that 40 lawsuits are being litigated. Retroactive immunity should be given to phone companies, Specter said. There is a way to protect the phone companies without giving up the details of their programs, Specter said.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said that it is time to hold the government accountable and let the Supreme Court review the bill. Sen. Leahy said he supports the amendments presented by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). This administration is not above the law, Sen. Leahy said.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who wanted to strike lawsuit immunity, said that the administration has been doing warrantless wiretapping for too long. “Five years is too much.” Dodd said that it is a matter of balancing national security with constitutional rights, and when any government makes citizens give up their rights for national security, it is wrong. The government should have the tools to stop terrorism, but it must stay balanced with the rights of its citizens, Dodd said.
Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said the Senate Committee on Intelligence oversees the use of wiretapping to make sure it does not violate citizens’ rights. But Senate intelligence briefings do have to stop at a certain point, Bond said, or otherwise too much will be revealed. The telephone companies are being “good patriotic Americans” and should be protected.
Before the vote, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said, in his opening statement, that 40 lawsuits are being litigated. Retroactive immunity should be given to phone companies, Specter said. There is a way to protect the phone companies without giving up the details of their programs, Specter said.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said that it is time to hold the government accountable and let the Supreme Court review the bill. Sen. Leahy said he supports the amendments presented by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). This administration is not above the law, Sen. Leahy said.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who wanted to strike lawsuit immunity, said that the administration has been doing warrantless wiretapping for too long. “Five years is too much.” Dodd said that it is a matter of balancing national security with constitutional rights, and when any government makes citizens give up their rights for national security, it is wrong. The government should have the tools to stop terrorism, but it must stay balanced with the rights of its citizens, Dodd said.
Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said the Senate Committee on Intelligence oversees the use of wiretapping to make sure it does not violate citizens’ rights. But Senate intelligence briefings do have to stop at a certain point, Bond said, or otherwise too much will be revealed. The telephone companies are being “good patriotic Americans” and should be protected.
Mukasey dodges bullets
A barrage of questions from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) proved ineffective. When asked by Schumer whether he would make records from certain cases from the Office of Professional Responsibility available to committee, Mukasey stated that it would depend on evidence. In response to his testimony, Schumer stated that he was very disappointed with the Attorney General’s answers. These sentiments were echoed by other members of the committee.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) criticized the Office of Legal Counsel’s actions, referring to it as ‘George Bush’s Shop of Legal Horrors'. He also called for Mukasey to learn from past mistakes in the deparment.
Mukasey was also questioned about new terrorist investigation criteria. These criteria would allow the department to access information on things like travel records and weapons possession. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WIS) addressed the issue, asking about the limits to which these criteria would go. Mukasey dismissed the questions as dealing with hypotheticals.