Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 11:31AM |
Staff
By Justine Rellosa
Talk Radio News Service
President Barack Obama's decision to open up areas in the Gulf of Mexico, parts of Alaska, and the Atlantic coastline for possible oil exploration has sparked swarms of reaction from both supporters and opponents of domestic offshore drilling.
In an interview with Talk Radio News Service, Christina Larson with the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C. said it is too soon to completely grasp the President's new policy, but said it reflects the administration's attempt to shift the debate from health reform to energy.
"This is sort of the opening bell of the discussion. It's not the end of the discussion by any means so it's really hard to say what it means, [or] who's going to be happy [and] who's not going to be happy," said Larson. "The one thing we do know is that the discussion in Washington is shifting from health care towards an environment that focuses on energy and climate issues."
Although Mr. Obama is already taking heat from Republicans who argue that his new initiative doesn't go far enough, he is receiving some bipartisan support. Rep. Mike Haridopolos (R-Fla.) told Talk Radio News Service on Thursday that he fully embraces the President's decision, calling it a good start toward making the U.S. completely energy independent.
"I think it is a very encouraging first step, I think that we could still do more," said Haridopolos."This should be part of an all-energy solution meaning not just oil, not just natural gas, but a combination of alternative fuels as well, meaning developing solar and bio-diesel and other things. But, I think this is a great first step it will help each of the states with royalties and it should also make sure that we are not dependent on foreign oil."
On Wednesday, two prominent Republicans, House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) both released statements saying they were wary of Mr. Obama's announcement.
"I'm skeptical," said Brady. "Looking closely at the president's proposal, it will delay more than drill by pushing back leases and delegating drilling decisions in the eastern Gulf of Mexico to a Congress more obsessed with global warming than affordable American-made energy."
However, Haridopolos isn't on an island by himself when it comes to supporting the new initiative. Issac Hayes, a youth Minister from Chicago who is running this fall for the House seat currently occupied by Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), released a statement on Wednesday echoing Haridopolos's sentiments.
"The President’s announcement to allow drilling along America’s coastline is long welcomed news. The off shore drilling ban has been an unwanted and unneeded moratorium on energy exploration...I am cautiously optimistic that this is not a smoke screen for a soon to come cap-and-trade bill jammed down our throats."
Both U.S. And Afghanistan Must Take Ownership Of Missteps, Says Liberal Analyst
Talk Radio News Service
There have been recent reports regarding U.S military involvement in the deaths of three Afghan women in February following an American Special Operations attack. The nighttime raid is now being called a cover-up with signs of evidence tampering at the scene by Special Operation Forces, who dug out bullets from the bodies of the women in order to hide the true nature of their deaths.
Matthew Duss, National Security Editor at the Center for American Progress, said the U.S. had dealt with the situation in an incorrect manner by choosing to cover-up the true outcome of the assault.
“When there are civilian casualties and other collateral damage to operations like this, I would think that the best thing to do is to own up to it, and recognize it, and deal with the problem. In general, it seems to me that the U.S. has been better at doing that.” said Duss. “General McChrystal himself has been personally involved in dealing with the families of certain civilians in the past who have been killed by air raids or other raids carried out by special forces. It seems it was just not done this time.”
Despite Afghan President Hamid Karzai accusing Western troops of weakening his government, said Duss, Karzai himself is truly to blame for the fact that his government is still dysfunctional.
“What the U.S. and its partners are trying to do is to help stand up an effective and legitimate Afghan central government, and the ongoing corruption of that government really handicaps that effort. We had President Obama in Afghanistan just last weekend making a very public plea to Karzai to deal with the problem,” said Duss.
According to Duss, it is unclear what the United States can really do in Afghanistan if the culture of corruption is not effectively managed by Karzai and his government.