UPDATED: As expected, the Senate rejected President Obama’s $447 billion jobs plan Tuesday, ending its legislative life as an assembled package.
The bill fell well short of the 60 votes needed to proceed, garnering support from only 50 members while 49 members opposed it.
Sens. Bob Nelson (D-Neb.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) joined Republicans in opposing the bill, but centrist Democratic Sens. Jim Web and Joe Lieberman, who voted in favor of debating the bill, said they’d vote against the bill in a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ situation.
Obama’s jobs plan may be dead as a unified deal, but Democrats will continue to push to pass the bill piece by piece. A proposal to extend payroll tax cuts could be the first among many smaller provisions to be passed.
The Senate is also expected Wednesday to pass three lingering trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and Colombia that have been touted by both Republicans and Democrats as job creators.
This story was updated at 8:21a.m. EST…
WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama has hit the road in recent weeks, using more than a dozen public appearances to push Congress to vote on and pass his American Jobs Act as a whole.
The Senate will be the first body to act on the president’s jobs bill, with a vote expected Tuesday evening. However, the effort led by Obama to label congressional Republicans as obstructionists could put vulnerable Democrats facing tough reelections in a bind.
Sen. Chuck Schumer tiptoed around questions from NBC’s Chuck Todd over the amount of Democratic support the bill would receive in the upper chamber, only saying that “you are going to see the overwhelming majority of Democrats vote for a jobs bill.”
The third-ranking Senate Democrat expressed little optimism on the jobs bill’s chances of surviving a Senate vote.
“We are not going to get their votes today,” Schumer said of a number of moderate Senate Republicans.
President Obama indicated late last week in a news conference with reporters that he would pursue a piece-by-piece approach to getting his jobs bill through Congress should Tuesday’s vote be shot down. It seems as though Democrats in the Senate have taken that notion to heart as rumors of a “Plan B,” which breaks the bill into smaller provisions with a higher probability of garnering bipartisan support, have already begun taking shape.
Meanwhile, labor leaders are literally praying for the bill to pass. A small group of labor leaders, including members of the Service Employees International Union, are expected to hold a prayer vigil on Capitol Hill just before senators are expected to vote.
DC Rep Intro's Bill To Bring New Income To Nation's Capital
By Janie Amaya
Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) is expected to present Congress with the National Disaster Insurance Protection Act this week, making D.C. an international financial center for catastrophic insurance reserve, if passed.
The bill would amend federal tax law to make the District a special tax jurisdiction exempting catastrophic insurance reserves and the investment income from federal taxes while creating jobs and boosting the District’s economy, according to a statement released by Norton.
“My bill is particularly timely considering the earthquakes and hurricane that caused billions of dollars in damages this summer, and the record number of natural disasters throughout the U.S. this year,” Norton said. “Retaining funds here in the U.S. would fuel both the local and U.S. economies, would provide the protection of U.S. laws for individuals and businesses with property and casualty insurance and would protect U.S. taxpayers, who would otherwise likely have to pick up the tab if there were a failure in reserve fund availability.”
According to Norton, by requiring companies to have offices in the District, jobs would become available for residents which would then, in turn, to increased income and sales and property tax revenue.
“The District has become an international city and destination,” Norton said. “Why wouldn’t the country prefer those billions in reserves to be held here rather than offshore? Especially today, when the U.S. economy is suffering from global placement of jobs outside the U.S.”