Thursday
Apr152010
Supreme Court Asks For Nearly $4 Million More Than Previous Year
By Chingyu Wang-Talk Radio News Service
The Supreme Court needs nearly $4 million more than it has the previous year, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told members of the House Appropriations Committee Thursday.
"We have, as in previous years, been very serious about our responsibility to review our budget needs," Thomas said, addressing the Court's $77 million budget request. "I emphasize the word 'needs.' We do not look at this as wants or a wish list."
Thomas said the increase of $3,724,000 from the last budget request was an unavoidable adjustment.
"70% of that increase is non-discretionary, it's mandatory. It is basically what is required to continue operating at our current level."
Thomas noted that a $122 million modernization project started in 2003 for the Court's iconic building will be completed soon.
"It's expected to be done this summer, with the closed off activities drifting into the early part of next year," said Thomas.
The Supreme Court needs nearly $4 million more than it has the previous year, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told members of the House Appropriations Committee Thursday.
"We have, as in previous years, been very serious about our responsibility to review our budget needs," Thomas said, addressing the Court's $77 million budget request. "I emphasize the word 'needs.' We do not look at this as wants or a wish list."
Thomas said the increase of $3,724,000 from the last budget request was an unavoidable adjustment.
"70% of that increase is non-discretionary, it's mandatory. It is basically what is required to continue operating at our current level."
Thomas noted that a $122 million modernization project started in 2003 for the Court's iconic building will be completed soon.
"It's expected to be done this summer, with the closed off activities drifting into the early part of next year," said Thomas.
Obama Judicial Nominee Meets Republican Resistance
Republicans strongly challenged the record of Goodwin Liu, an Obama nominee for the 9th Circut Court of Appeals, Friday during the UC Berkley professor’s appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"The nominee has not been in court and tried cases. He's never tried a case, never argued a case on appeal. Therefore, [Liu] lacks the normal experience we look for,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the committee’s top Republican, argued.
Sessions also expressed dissatisfaction with a statement the nominee had made in regard to the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Sam Alito.
"Judge Alito's record envisions an America where police may shoot and kill an unarmed boy to stop him from running away with a stolen purse, where federal agents may point guns at ordinary citizens during a raid, even after no sign of resistance, where the FBI may install a camera where you sleep... where a black man may be sentenced to death by an all-white jury for killing a white man,” Sessions read, quoting Liu.
Commented Sessions, “I do think that's unfair."
Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) echoed Sessions’ sentiments, and claimed the comments were "vicious and emotionally and racially charged."
In addition, Sessions took Liu to task for failing to list a number of speaking engagements in a questionnaire requested by the Committee.
"I submitted all these items to the committee in the interest of providing the fullest possible information for your consideration," Liu said in response. "I am sorry that the list is long, and I am sorry that I missed things the first time."