myspace views counter
Search

Search Talk Radio News Service:

Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief
Search
Search Talk Radio News Service:
Latest Photos
@PoliticalBrief

Entries in benjamin netanyahu (182)

Thursday
Nov082007

An Ominous Message

By Jack Rice
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cjhx75_c1wc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cjhx75_c1wc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Thursday
Nov082007

Consumerism versus Nationalism

By Jack Rice
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8YA8TMr3xw8&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8YA8TMr3xw8&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Wednesday
Nov072007

9/11 on the Bosporus

By Jack Rice
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DtV-ZZOjmHw&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DtV-ZZOjmHw&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Tuesday
Oct302007

Contraceptives for 11-year-olds isn't so crazy

By Ellen Ratner
Yesterday on "Fox and Friends," Jim Pinkerton and I debated a Fox news poll concerning children and the availability of contraception. Fifty-seven percent said giving contraceptives to children as young as 11 years old "was a nutty idea"; 26 percent said it was a brilliant idea. The most interesting poll result, however, was that a full 83 percent of those polled said that 11-year-olds were having sex.



This poll question originated from a Maine middle school that is making a "full range of contraception available to students in grades six to eight." It was shocking to those of us who grew up in schools where girls could only wear skirts no shorter than mid-knee. However, the statistics show that it makes public health sense for the school system to make contraception available to these children.

In the state of Maine, the number of middle school children who reported having sexual intercourse dropped from 23 percent in 1997 to 13 percent in 2005. The numbers, if they are accurate, are definitely going in the right direction, but as Nancy Birkhimer, director of teen health programs for the Maine Department of Health and Human Services says, "13 percent is still more than one in 10 students."

In King Middle School, children must have their parents permission to receive health care, but the law in Maine does not mandate that parents know what services a child receives. Many parents, both on the left and right side of the political spectrum, want to know what their children are being taught in the schools and what kind of medical services and sex education their children are receiving. Many parents believe that it is their job, not the schools, to provide sex education and information to their children.

In a perfect world, it would be great if the responsibility for sex education could be handled at home. However, we no longer live in a "Leave It to Beaver" and "Father Knows Best" fantasyland of the mid-20th century. The amount of dysfunctional and abusive families in America (as well as in other countries) is staggeringly high.

The dysfunctional statistics are not pretty. The state of Missouri estimates 25 to 50 percent of children experience some form of child abuse including sexual, physical and neglect. In one study of college students, 17 percent of female students reported sexual abuse before the age of 18. In the most recent child abuse data available, 1.2 percent of children had been reported abused, and that was for only one year. That figure multiplied by 17 years; that is quite a significant number of reported cases. In one economically depressed community, up to 40 percent of adult women who were patients at a general health clinic reported severe childhood maltreatment based on a standard trauma questionnaire.

Parents who abuse their children, (or parents who do nothing when their children are abused by others – family members, boyfriends etc.), cannot provide quality sex education to their children. These parents should not even be allowed to sign on the dotted line to allow their children to receive health services through the school clinic system, as many of these parents have secrets to hide from the authorities.

Many of the people opposed to giving sexually active children contraception though the school system also believe that we should not have needle exchange for those who are addicted to drugs. The argument is the same; if we don't treat it then somehow it won't be as big a problem. It is in fact the opposite. Every needle that is exchanged gives the health care worker an opportunity to ask the addict if they want help. Every time a child comes in to discuss a need for contraception, a school nurse has an opportunity to intervene in what is most surely an unhealthy relationship.

The polling indicates that we want our society to be different than it is. We believe that children as young as 11 are having sex, but we don't want to give them help in preventing sexually transmitted diseases or pregnancy. It is our shared delusion that somehow giving contraception to these children is going to spark more sexual activity in these children. Instead, the availability of contraception might stop the cycle of child abuse as well as the need for these children to repeat with their peers what they least understand.
Monday
Oct222007

Rooting for Ron

By Ellen Ratner
I attended my second college football game last weekend. The United States Air Force Academy Falcons handily defeated the Wyoming Cowboys, (alma mater of Vice President Dick Cheney after failing out of Yale University). The game was wonderful, and I especially liked the pre-game phenomenon I learned of called tailgating, which, prior to the weekend, I thought was an annoying driving technique. As I surveyed Falcon Stadium's parking lot in search of the best tailgate food, a sea of presidential campaign '08 signs, bumper stickers and enthusiasts surprised me. I was even more surprised to see that there was only one candidate chosen – Rep./Dr. Ron Paul.



I'm not great at math like the Air Force Academy cadets, but I understand a bit about probabilities and statistics. At this point, most in the media would agree that the probability of Ron Paul being president is somewhere in the neighborhood of "never in a million years" and "when hell freezes over." But the increasing number of Paul supporters caused me to take a long second look at Rep. Paul, especially since the Ron Paul supporters were sitting with the Falcon fans – a group with one of the highest voter turnout.

I asked my host why the Falcon fans, most of them are connected to the Air Force Academy in some significant way, (alumni, parents of cadets, Air Force retirees, active duty military stationed at the Academy etc.), support Ron Paul. The answer was, "Because there are a lot of libertarians in the military, and they are not happy about King George."

There is a lot of blue sky between Ron Paul and myself. But overall, I have been a fan of Ron Paul's since the first Republican debate when he was the only one who had the courage to shine the light on our failed Iraq policy while the others use President Bush as their own Kevlar body armor. Their mantra of "don't ask, don't tell" is working – as in "Please don't ask me about Iraq, because I won't tell." Ron Paul also has the moral authority to criticize this war since he voted against it. It is clear that many members of the military are in this camp as well.

Yet, despite my being impressed with Ron Paul, I must confess that I have, like my colleagues in the Fifth Estate, ignored this drafted Air Force Flight surgeon turned U.S. congressman. He deserves to be taken seriously. Oddly enough, Ron Paul's core campaign resonates the most with primary voters. He has an answer to their most frequently asked questions, "What are you going to do about curbing the federal government's power? Or, what are you going to do to restore the Constitution and rule of law?" Ron Paul's website gives the answer in the first sentence:

"Congressman Ron Paul, R-Texas, is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation's capital. As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets and a return to sound monetary policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution."

After reading Ron Paul's website, along with several of the policy papers he has written over the years, I have concluded that he may stand a chance in a Republican primary after all. Republican primary voters are tired of big government, big spending, big regulation, big trade cartels, big foreign commitments and big egos.

There's no worry about a big ego with Ron Paul. He looks like a gynecologist. Actually, he specialized in gynecology out of Duke Medical School. Paul is a breath of fresh air among all the testosterone and hair gel on the Republican ticket. Ron Paul isn't the 9/11 candidate. His website makes him the 4/11 candidate. It's where voters are going for information. He has the greatest number of YouTube hits. It's time for the media to start giving him the airtime he has earned.
Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 37 Next 5 Entries »