Wednesday
Sep242008
Paulson defends bailout plan to Congress
"All of us should be angry," said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson at a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee. He said that the keys to this "disaster" were housing prices and borrowed money. He said that both corporations and homebuyers are guilty of bad financial maneuvers that allowed for this bailout to be needed.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that if we do not bail out these companies quickly, we would see increasing unemployment, higher numbers of foreclosures, and fewer available jobs. Referring to the cost of the bailout, Bernanke said that this bailout would cost "much less than 700 billion dollars," and he said that the cost to the taxpayers is smaller now than it could be later if the bailout is not done now.
Rep. Chris Ackerman (D-N.Y.) echoed the sentiments of many congressmen saying "I don't see [in Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's proposal] any protection to stop us from having this problem again." Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) said he did not feel comfortable paying for this plan with taxpayer money while high ranking officials of these bankrupt institutions were "lining their pockets" along with their companies.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that if we do not bail out these companies quickly, we would see increasing unemployment, higher numbers of foreclosures, and fewer available jobs. Referring to the cost of the bailout, Bernanke said that this bailout would cost "much less than 700 billion dollars," and he said that the cost to the taxpayers is smaller now than it could be later if the bailout is not done now.
Rep. Chris Ackerman (D-N.Y.) echoed the sentiments of many congressmen saying "I don't see [in Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's proposal] any protection to stop us from having this problem again." Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) said he did not feel comfortable paying for this plan with taxpayer money while high ranking officials of these bankrupt institutions were "lining their pockets" along with their companies.
Businesses right to reorganize is questioned
The question Sanchez wanted answered is whether Chapter 11 works the way Congress intended it to, or if the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Privacy Act is making it harder for businesses to reorganize, thus reverting to the straight liquidation in Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Witness Lawrence Gottlieb of Cooley Godward Kronish LLP said that Chapter 11 has become, "nothing more than a vehicle through which secured lenders, whether they be banks, hedge funds, or private equity, sell the assets of a company through a quick sale process that provides very little, if any, opportunity for retailers to restructure their debt and rehabilitate their business".
Professor Barry Adler of the New York University School of Law said that "it is better to have failed firms be liquidated, because if they're dead economically, they're going to liquidate anyway. The assets can be redeployed to better uses, if the liquidation is quick, and creditors can receive a higher return than they would originally receive". The question remains of whether a failing business will better serve the economy if bailed out at the expense of taxpayers, or left to the hands of Adam Smith.