Wednesday
Jul092008
FISA: Telecom immunity okay
The Senate passed the update to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that grants immunity to telecom companies from lawsuits with a 69-28 vote.
Before the vote, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said, in his opening statement, that 40 lawsuits are being litigated. Retroactive immunity should be given to phone companies, Specter said. There is a way to protect the phone companies without giving up the details of their programs, Specter said.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said that it is time to hold the government accountable and let the Supreme Court review the bill. Sen. Leahy said he supports the amendments presented by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). This administration is not above the law, Sen. Leahy said.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who wanted to strike lawsuit immunity, said that the administration has been doing warrantless wiretapping for too long. “Five years is too much.” Dodd said that it is a matter of balancing national security with constitutional rights, and when any government makes citizens give up their rights for national security, it is wrong. The government should have the tools to stop terrorism, but it must stay balanced with the rights of its citizens, Dodd said.
Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said the Senate Committee on Intelligence oversees the use of wiretapping to make sure it does not violate citizens’ rights. But Senate intelligence briefings do have to stop at a certain point, Bond said, or otherwise too much will be revealed. The telephone companies are being “good patriotic Americans” and should be protected.
Before the vote, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said, in his opening statement, that 40 lawsuits are being litigated. Retroactive immunity should be given to phone companies, Specter said. There is a way to protect the phone companies without giving up the details of their programs, Specter said.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said that it is time to hold the government accountable and let the Supreme Court review the bill. Sen. Leahy said he supports the amendments presented by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). This administration is not above the law, Sen. Leahy said.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who wanted to strike lawsuit immunity, said that the administration has been doing warrantless wiretapping for too long. “Five years is too much.” Dodd said that it is a matter of balancing national security with constitutional rights, and when any government makes citizens give up their rights for national security, it is wrong. The government should have the tools to stop terrorism, but it must stay balanced with the rights of its citizens, Dodd said.
Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said the Senate Committee on Intelligence oversees the use of wiretapping to make sure it does not violate citizens’ rights. But Senate intelligence briefings do have to stop at a certain point, Bond said, or otherwise too much will be revealed. The telephone companies are being “good patriotic Americans” and should be protected.
Republican senators take a stand on protecting American justice
Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said that there is no excuse for not considering voting upon a good judicial nominee. He said that republicans are ready to go to work and serve justice. Sen. John Warner said it is sad watching qualified nominees not get invited to hearings and go into the “partisan fight.” Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.) agreed with Warner and said that good nominees should not be trumped by partisan politics.
John McGinnis of Northwestern Law School said the process of confirming judicial nominees has broken down in the last few years and become a partisan process. He explained that over the last twenty years, the Senate Judiciary Committee has often refused to hold hearings or take votes on federal court nominees of a President who is a member of the opposing political party. McGinnis said that by delaying or refusing to provide hearings for plausibly qualified federal court nominees, the Judiciary Committee is likely to harm the quality of the judiciary. He proposed that the Committee pass a rule requiring the Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing within six months of a nomination and to hold a Committee vote without one month of the hearing, unless at least two-thirds of the Committee agrees to postpone it.
David Bohn of the North Carolina Bar Association said that his association joins in calling for nominations to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to move forward immediately, specifically Judge Robert Conrad’s nomination. Bohn said that further delay in the nomination will cause more harm than good, and that to continue to have the State of North Carolina under-represented in the Circuit is “a misfortunate, unnecessary detriment to the public and the legal community of North Carolina.”
Roscoe Howard, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, explained that the D.C. Circuit has been affected by a growing caseload. He said that not having vacancies filled during a time like this is “just wrong.” Howard gave his support for Mr. Keisler and Judge Conrad and said that when the confirmation of men such as them fail to move forward, there is an appearance of a lack of appreciation of their capabilities, and of the respect they have earned. More importantly, Howard said that the integrity of the U.S. judicial system of selecting judges is harmed and diminished.